Template:Did you know nominations/Queen's Building

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Queen's Building's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC).

Queen's Building edit

Queen's Building during the 1890s

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self nominated at 08:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Sufficient expansion, suitably referenced, free of copyvio (checked a couple of sources with Duplication Detector), QPQ done. Photo licence ok. The sources confirm the hook facts, but I simply can't believe that it's true. They apparently knocked this building down, then fluffed around trying to sort out an office building, changing their mind, building a 26 floor hotel instead and opened it, and all of that within 10 months? Come on, that just cannot be right. I accept that it does that that in the sources, but suggest that you come up with a different hook fact. Schwede66 10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Can't the ALT1 hook do instead? —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT1 hook fact AGF. Schwede66 18:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)