Template:Did you know nominations/Pavao Dragičević

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Pavao Dragičević

edit
  • ... that Bishop Pavao Dragičević may have selected Elijah as patron saint of Bosnia and Herzegovina due to his veneration by the country's Muslims, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians?
  • ALT1:... that Pavao Dragičević's nomination of Elijah, venerated by Muslims, Catholics and the Orthodox, as patron saint of Bosnia was allegedly approved by the pope because "a wild nation deserved a wild patron"?
  • Reviewed: Long-tailed spiny rat
  • Comment: I slightly prefer the original hook.

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 12:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 20:03, 06 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2330 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (1.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • New enough, long enough, adequately referenced. No close paraphrasing seen in foreign-language refs checked through Google Translate. ALT1 is over 200 characters. It's also unclear why you're putting that phrase in quotes, as it is your own paraphrase of the source and does not appear in quotes in the article. ALT0 is hooky; foreign-language ref AGF (although I can confirm it with Google Translate) and cited inline. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 00:44, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Well, without the quotation marks, the alt hook is down to 202 characters. Still too long, though. I am just as happy with the first hook. Surtsicna (talk) 13:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
  • OK. First hook good to go. Yoninah (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)