- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
5x expanded by Hawkeye7 (talk) and AustralianRupert (talk). Nominated by Hawkeye7 (talk) at 11:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC).
- Looks good. Article is within policy and aggregates a range of sources. The cited book is available on Google Books and the article does not paraphrase it. I'm not editing from a browser I can run the script to check 5x expansion on, so this isn't a full endorsement and I'm not going to be trying to count this review as a QPQ. But checks out as far as I can see. Blythwood (talk) 19:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)