Template:Did you know nominations/Kenneth Le Couteur

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Kenneth Le Couteur edit

Kenneth Le Couteur
Kenneth Le Couteur
  • ... that during the Second World War, Kenneth Le Couteur (pictured) worked at Bletchley Park on Tunny? Source: "When the war started, he was one of the mathematicians recruited to Bletchley Park to decode German military messages sent through the Enigma machine. The codes were given the names of fish and he worked on tunny." [1]

Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC).

  • All appears fine, judged against the criteria:
  1. New enough: Yes – article started 17 October 2016.
  2. Long enough: Yes – c. 4,650 characters
  3. Within policy: Yes – All information appears supported by citations (minimum of one per paragraph); not a BLP; sources are all reliable; no copyright violations,(according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector).
  • Hook:
  1. Is 98 characters, so short enough
  2. Is interesting enough (to me at least!)
  3. Is cited: Yes – Bletchley information supported by two citations; the "Tunny" machine supported by one. No "negative aspects" to worry about
  • Image:
  1. Yes, present in the article
  2. Yes, shows up well in thumbnail size
  3. Is free from restrictions (image was released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)

This looks OK for me. However - note to the closers - please note that this is my first DYK review, so a quick glance over the main points just to double check would be appreciated. Please ping me if there is anything else I need to do. - The Bounder (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC) 16:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

The Bounder Review looks good to me, more comprehensive than most reviews on here. Joseph2302 20:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)