Template:Did you know nominations/Katherine Oppenheimer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 13:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Katherine Oppenheimer edit

Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC).

  • New enough, nominated same day as moved to article space. 8.5+ times long enough. Article written in neutral manner. Article is replete with inline citations, and every paragraph has at least one. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues detected. Small returns by Earwig are for phrases which can not be easily or elegantly otherwise stated "member of the Communist Party" or book titles. Hook is within format, and should be interesting to those with an interest in history, broadly construed. Hook is not implausible, and easy to AGF to the source, which is cited in the article directly after the claim. QPQ complete. No DYK image to check against. Interesting, well-written article on an unusual individual, this is ready for and deserving of mainspace exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)