Template:Did you know nominations/Conner Mertens

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Conner Mertens edit

Created by Bagumba (talk). Self nominated at 19:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Looks good to me. Article is new and long enough. Hook is sourced in both the lead and main body of the article. QPQ done. – JuneGloom Talk 17:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
@JuneGloom07: Your comment is rather cursory. Kindly state for the record and in more explicit terms the evaluation wrt DYK criteria. Thanks, -- Ohc ¡digame! 02:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)(UTC)
Okay, never had a problem before, but here we go. The article was created on 16 February, has a prose portion over 1,500 characters, is reliably sourced throughout. I can see no copyright violations and it is neutral throughout. The hook is reliably sourced in the lead and main body. It is also under 200 characters and is interesting. Nominator has done the QPQ. - JuneGloom Talk 01:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)