Template:Did you know nominations/Church of All Saints (Sutton Courtenay)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Church of All Saints (Sutton Courtenay) edit

The church tower

  • Reviewed: New editor

Created by Coatesinchocolate (talk). Nominated by Gilderien (talk) at 23:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC).

  • Length and date ok. Photo is on Commons. Not a self-nom, thus no QPQ needed. But the hook fact is not supported by a direct reference. --Soman (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Why not just say the church's name in the hook? EEng (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Because it would make it longer and it isn't really in the church, but the churchyard so that would make it even longer.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 13:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure why you're so worried about length, but consider
ALT1 ... that George Orwell, Earl Asquith and David Astor are all buried in the churchyard of All Saints, Sutton Courtenay (pictured)?
But it's just a suggestion. EEng (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Full review needed, since issues like neutrality and close paraphrasing were not addressed in the original review, and the ALT1 hook needs reviewing as well. (Also whether the hook fact is indeed supported by a direct reference.) BlueMoonset (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • The article is new and long enough. NPOV. The hook facts are cited and the article has at least one inline citation per para. No close paraphrasing found. Image is suitable for MP. QPQ not required. Good to go with any of the two hooks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 04:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)