Template:Did you know nominations/Cervical agenesis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Cervical agenesis edit

Created by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 15:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC).

  • Looks good to me! Bali88 (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I've never reviewed before, I'll work on it. :-) Bali88 (talk) 17:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

(I did in fact find those sources online and confirm them, however, since a link is not given in the article, I believe this symbol is the appropriate one)

  • New. Long enough.
  • Neutrally written. Inline citation.
  • Hook okay & clearly cited in text.
  • No dablink or dead url issues.
  • No copyvio issues. (despite no links, these texts are available for view online) Bali88 (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)