The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Closing as it is still far from being 5x expanded

CKMP-FM

edit

5x expanded by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 20:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC).

  • Not a 5x expansion at this time: This revision has ~3100 characters, while the current one has ~9400. You'd have to get it up to about 15,500 for it to be eligible. See DYK rule 1b. If you can expand it further I'll give it a full review. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 21:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Actually, since it's 5x in seven days, the baseline would be 2637 prose characters from the final August 6 edit (from the latest revision over seven days before the nomination was submitted). The current 9294 prose characters is well shy of the 13,185 required for 5x, but 5x is well below 15.5K mentioned above. (DYKcheck was used to determine the 2637 and 9294 numbers.) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
  • No edits to expand article since the initial post from Antony-22; nominator was courtesy-notified the following day. Closing as it is still far from being 5x expanded (over 3800 prose characters are needed). BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 27 September 2014 (UTC)