- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Black catbird
edit.jpg)
- ... that although the type specimen of the black catbird (pictured) was reportedly collected in Honduras, the species has never been recorded there since?
5x expanded by MeegsC (talk). Self nominated at 13:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC).
- Reviewed: Olive-backed pocket mouse
Began review AshLin (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC).- New enough, Began 9 August 2014. Adequate size 7301 characters (1218 words) "readable prose size".
- Cited adequately, inline. Neutral.
- Hook interesting, suitably referenced, AGF.
- Close paraphrasing problem : "partners in flight estimated the, etc" ...
- @MeegsC:
please rectify close paraphrasing issues. AshLin (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Ashlin: There's not too many ways to convey that information, but I've tried. I've removed the Partners in Flight info (I guess it doesn't matter who made the population estimate) and simplified the sentence. Please let me know if that's sufficient.
- Paraphrasing issues resolved.
The AGF approval icon should certainly not have been used when beginning the review; cancelling it out with this icon, which is appropriate when a QPQ review is still undone. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Point well taken, BlueMoonset. AshLin (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm reviewing Olive-backed pocket mouse, but haven't quite finished. I'm in the field at the moment, and have to fit this in around 18-hour days! MeegsC (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
