- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Ballarat Miners edit
- ... that the Ballarat Miners introduced a women's team to the club in 2000?
- Reviewed: Caitriona Jennings
- Comment: It was tagged with notability. Hence the improvement efforts. (Yeah, not an Olympian or Paralympian.)
Created/expanded by Hack (talk), LauraHale (talk). Nominated by LauraHale (talk) at 21:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hook is interesting enough and it reliable sourced and cited, it is of required length. I'm not sure if the article has been expanded more than 5x in the past 5 days though looking at the history? Would like a second opinion.
Aaron • You Da One 17:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- For today: "Prose size (text only): 2400 characters (409 words) "readable prose size" Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 15 edits ago on July 9, 2012." The previous edit period with last edit before expansion was June 10, "Prose size (text only): 72 B (16 words) "readable prose size"" Where is the concern for five fold expansion? --LauraHale (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah okay. I looked at the history and it from the additions I couldn't tell if it had been 5x expanded or not. I don't understand how to use that counter wikipage you suggested, it confused me. So I just asked for a second opinion.
Aaron • You Da One 21:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah okay. I looked at the history and it from the additions I couldn't tell if it had been 5x expanded or not. I don't understand how to use that counter wikipage you suggested, it confused me. So I just asked for a second opinion.
