Template:Did you know nominations/All About That Bass

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by valereee (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

All About That Bass edit

Improved to Good Article status by MaranoFan (talk). Nominated by Trillfendi (talk) at 22:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC).

  • Hi. Thanks for the nomination and the improvements to the article. I did briefly consider nominating this for DYK and these are the hooks I was considering if anyone's interested:
My problem with the main hook is that All About That Bass didn’t really break any streaming record, since it’s success was gradual and resembled a sleeper hit. Cheers!—NØ 08:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
I guess the record it broke was charting based on streams (in the UK at least). “Congratulations to Meghan Trainor, who scores an historic first in the Official Singles Chart with her single All About That Bass. In scoring the first Top 40 hit on streams alone, she really has broken new ground.” [5] Trillfendi (talk) 11:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
@MaranoFan: I replaced it entirely since “somebody” (haters gonna hate hate hate) disagreed with it’s inclusion in the article at all. I put the trivia about its inspiration instead. Trillfendi (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
@MaranoFan: @Trillfendi: This looks mostly good to go, (new Good article, only pings on Earwigs are from cited quotes, no close-paraphrasing, hooks are neutral and are short enough for DYK), it just needs a QPQ from the nominator and sources for ALT2 and ALT3. I personally think ALT2 is the most interesting, pending confirmation of source. Morgan695 (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn’t QPQ not be required since Trillfendi (the nominator) has only received credit for 2 DYK noms? Added the sources you asked.—NØ 07:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Yup, you're correct. My mistake. Striking the other hooks, so the article is good to be moved and promoted. Morgan695 (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
If the nominator has less than 5 DYK credits then no QPQ is required (they are free to do so if they wish, but it's optional). I am also stating my preference for ALT2. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)