Template:Did you know nominations/Alice Coddington

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 03:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Alice Coddington, Brigitte Ardossi

edit
  • Reviewed: George Pechiney
  • Comment: Coddington was moved from user space. Ardossi was worked on in user space and is a 2x uncited tagged BLP problem expansion. If not long enough, Brigitte Ardossi can be removed.

Created/expanded by LauraHale (talk), Hawkeye7 (talk). Nominated by LauraHale (talk) at 02:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Passing comment: The Ardossi article cannot be a 2x unreferenced BLP because it had two (admittedly poor) references. However, if you can bump it up by 483 characters it will be a 5x expansion (expanding the lede would be an easy 200, at least). Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
    Spent some more time on it and got it more over the line.  :) --LauraHale (talk) 10:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Hook: Short enough, somewhat interesting, cited.
Coddington: New enough, long enough, references thorough and well formatted. Paraphrasing looks okay.
Ardossi: Length, date looks good (assuming history merge). Referencing thorough and well formatted. Paraphrasing looks okay.
Summary: Good to go! Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)