Talk:Yogi Bear (film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by SummerPhDv2.0 in topic No news that you know of

Citations

edit

I added citation, rm some unsourced info. It does appear to be coming sometime. I think there are more citations out there that can back it up. It does need some work, and yes, a bit premature, but reliable sources claim it is going to happen. If someone wants to AFD it to get more discussion, that is fine, but I don't think a csd or prod would apply here. PHARMBOY (moo) (plop) 18:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Yogi Bear

edit

This article may violate WP:CRYSTAL because it is just in the early development stage. I suggest it be merged into it's own section on the Yogi Bear article.--Snowman Guy (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit
  Resolved

I found these here images from the internet. Think they're the real deal? 24.45.36.73 (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's not a reliable source so there's no use for it here. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cindy Bear?

edit

Are you really sure that Cindy Bear will be in the film? All the trailers don't show her, and I have heard nothing about her being in the film? --Hoppybunny (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit

The film hasn't been released yet and there are so few critic reports available as yet that Rotten Tomatoes signals "no consensus". I've removed what I think is a premature report on critical reception. This will change quickly so we can update over the weekend. --TS 17:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

release date

edit

Originally slated for mid-June 2010 premier, the release was pushed to December 17, 2010. - Is this significant? Why not just put it in the movie box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booboo cam (talkcontribs) 02:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

We only list the earliest release dates in the infobox per WP:FILMRELEASE in its home country (the United States). Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
But why is this information so important for the summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booboo cam (talkcontribs) 02:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think we should move it down to the release section. Would that make more sense? Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Help fix misleading cast sentence

edit

I've tried to correct the sentence to clarify that only [Dan Aykroyd]], and Justin Timberlake voices are used but Sjones23 keeps deleting it. I think

"The film stars the voices of Dan Aykroyd, and Justin Timberlake with cast members Tom Cavanagh, Anna Faris, T. J. Miller, Nate Corddry, and Andrew Daly."

is accurate and the sentence should be corrected to show this.

Corrected. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:24, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's pretty clunky now, whatever you want I guess, I'll find something else.Booboo cam (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Further corrections have been made. Better? Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:57, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yogi Bear (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Off-topic chat

edit
Extended content

Sequel

Does anyone think the makers of the first film will really make a sequel to Yogi Bear? They announced the director in 2012, but other than that, nothing else has surfaced. It's almost like the Ghostbusters franchise where it took them 2 decades and a half to try and produce a potential third film, but you know what became of that unnecessary nonsense. Anyway, I get the feeling the second film is either in development hell or may never be made. Why do sequels always have to take so long, SO LONG, to be made? It should only take 2-5 years, maybe 10, years tops. No more. Hollywood enjoys making people desperate when it comes to sequels/prequels, or should I say follow-ups to films. It does not have to be this way. It's been almost six years since Yogi Bear and I say it's time we get more details about number 2. Marino13 (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

No news that you know of

edit

Re this edit: "Since 2012, no new information or development has surfaced."

This claims that there has been no information or news about the proposed project. While I will accept that you, as an individual, are unaware of any new information, this is not the same thing. It is entirely possible that there has been news (cancelled, pushed back, whatever) and you simply haven't heard about it. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

SavageEditor: You have restored a claim to the article. It is your WP:BURDEN to provide a source supporting your claim. If you are unable to do so, I will remove the claim again tomorrow. - SummerPhDv2.0 00:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply