Welcome!

Hello, Hoppybunny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Campbell Drive (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here edit

(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

No good reason, just felt the name warranted it. Sven Manguard Talk 03:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

"ATHF" edit

Just a note. When ever you mention Aqua Teen Hunger Force in an article, don't use the popular abbreviation "ATHF". Please write out the full title of the show in italics, like this: Aqua Teen Hunger Force. It makes more sense to readers who never herd of the show, and it looks better. Thanks! Grapesoda22 (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Warn edit

Sorry about that warn; I confused you with another vandal who was replacing content and at first thought your edit was vandalism as well. Anyways, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for helping! -download ׀ sign! 01:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space edit

  Hey there Hoppybunny, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Hoppybunny. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Chipmunks2squeakuel.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Chipmunks2squeakuel.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bible Fruit edit

I can see what you're trying to do with Bible Fruit. But at this moment in time those chacters aren't notable enough for their own page. It would make more sense to actually make an article based on the original season five episode "Bible Fruits" when Soul Quest Overdrive eventually comes out. Grapesoda22 (talk) 02:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

SpongeBob image edit

If you want to upload that new image, you need to do it under a new file name, or give a new rationale for the image. BOVINEBOY2008 14:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Cdave.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Cdave.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Meatwad loves Carl.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Meatwad loves Carl.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Meatwad loves Carl.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Meatwad loves Carl.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. It's... MR BERTY! talk/stalk 19:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please discuss SpongeBob Characters edit

Regarding the SpongeBob character page. Can you please get involved in the discussion before reverting the image or content. Typically if an edit you make is reverted then you should engage in discussion. Thanks. --Bill (talk|contribs) 22:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also, you have reverted 3 times within 24 hours. Please take note of The 3 revert rule before reverting changes again. --Bill (talk|contribs) 22:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please discuss your edits. You will be reported for edit warring, Hoppybunny, if you continue to edit in this manner. There is already discussion on Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters. BOVINEBOY2008 14:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:MOSFILM for suggestions on how to improve Wikipedia film articles. Do not add pedantic explanations of protagonist or antagonist to the cast list of film articles. I have not reverted that edit as it is likely your other edits will be reverted for failing to properly discuss your edits. If you are unhappy with the cast list being in order of appearance you will need to discuss that with the other editors. -- Horkana (talk) 01:09, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into File:Spongebob Characters.jpg, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 06:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Alice poster edit

That poster is a promotional poster for Alice in Wonderland. Just like The Red Queen, The White Queen, and TweedleDee and TweedleDum are. Now please stop. Mike Allen 22:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Get involved in discussion edit

Look, when you're blocked for edit warring and refusing to discuss edits, it's not a good idea to return to doing the exact same thing after your block expires. I am reverting your changes back to the original version and I expect you to get involved in the discussion that is present on the talk page with the other users. Otherwise you'll end up getting reported again. --Bill (talk|contribs) 01:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 06:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cdave.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Cdave.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Yogi-bear-20101201042800335 thumb ign.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Yogi-bear-20101201042800335 thumb ign.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ranger Jones for deletion edit

 

The article Ranger Jones is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranger Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Mr. Ranger.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Ranger.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Yogi-bear-20101201042830148 thumb ign.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Yogi-bear-20101201042830148 thumb ign.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring on Aqua Teen Hunger Force edit

I notice that both you and Grapesoda22 (talk · contribs) have been steadily edit warring on Aqua Teen Hunger Force for over an hour. You both have exceeded 3RR and may be blocked, so I suggest you stop unproductively reverting and discuss the issue on the talk page of the article. Thanks, Goodvac (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Mike schatz.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Mike schatz.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Clay martin croker.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Clay martin croker.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Carey means.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Carey means.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Carey_means.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Carey_means.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Clay_martin_croker.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Clay_martin_croker.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 19:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Mike_schatz.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Mike_schatz.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Editing edit

I suggest you go and review WP:SIMPLE. You need to explain your edits as to what you are doing and why. BOVINEBOY2008 06:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

You need a source for what you are trying to do. Your own analysis and your opinion are not good enough. BOVINEBOY2008 08:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Again, you need to back up your changes with sources to maintain verifiability. BOVINEBOY2008 21:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
When you get a chance, can you respond at Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters? Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 08:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:133px-Rodger Bumpass.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:133px-Rodger Bumpass.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:113px-Bill Fagerbakke.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:113px-Bill Fagerbakke.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Yogi-bear-20101201042830148 thumb ign.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yogi-bear-20101201042830148 thumb ign.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Mr. Ranger.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mr. Ranger.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Yogi-bear-20101201042800335 thumb ign.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yogi-bear-20101201042800335 thumb ign.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

Please stop uploading images. You evidently have no understanding of copyright and of our WP:image use policy. The many notices above should have told you you are doing something wrong. Most of your images will probably have to be deleted as copyright violations. Please do not continue uploading images until you have read and understood our policies.

If you continue making bad image uploads, I'm afraid I will have to block you. Fut.Perf. 23:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alvin and the Chipmunks (film series) for deletion edit

 

The article Alvin and the Chipmunks (film series) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin and the Chipmunks (film series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 02:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mayor Brown (Yogi Bear) for deletion edit

 

The article Mayor Brown (Yogi Bear) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor Brown (Yogi Bear) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 04:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

While I appreciate your enthusiasm for editing, you cannot keep recreating articles that have been removed in an AfD request. Continuing to do so despite multiple warnings could result in a block. In regards to your edits regarding Mayor Brown, it's unfortunate that you've chosen to disregard the earlier messages to you on the original page you attempted to create, but I suggest you read up on Wikipedia: Notability. Don't let any of this get you down; you seem like you could be able to make a real improvement to the encyclopedia, and I hope you'll continue to edit in a more constructive manner. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page, located here. --Yaksar (let's chat) 04:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

creating new pages on the wikia where they'd be appreciated edit

Your contributions would be welcomed on various wikis. There is a wiki dedicated to Yogi Bear found at http://yogibear.wikia.com/wiki/Yogi_Bear_Wiki and a larger one for Aqua Teen Hunger Force at http://aqua-teen-hunger-force.wikia.com/wiki/Aqua_Teen_Hunger_Force with 392 articles. There you are encouraged to make articles for every single character there is, with as much detail as possible. Might as well go where your work will be appreciated. Dream Focus 14:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel Johnson (Yogi Bear) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rachel Johnson (Yogi Bear) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

February 2011 edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ranger Jones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JDDJS (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have much the same modus operandi as Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). This may be an unfortunate coincidence, but since B101 is banned for disruption you get blocked for the same reasons. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rachel Johnson (Yogi Bear) edit

 

The article Rachel Johnson (Yogi Bear) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Now blocked user has continually created pages of no real notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:Alvin and the Chipmunks film series edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Alvin and the Chipmunks film series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply