Talk:Yaroslav Hunka scandal/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Why is "Canadian White Supremacists" listed as a category?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

His motivations for joining the war weren't rooted in any desires for racial supremacy, he joined the war to fight for his country. I don't understand why he's listed as a white supremacist, has he made any remarks that would indicate he is, if so they should be included in the article. TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Pretty sure the nazis were white supremacists. Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Categories for biographies should be neutral, defining, and verifiable from reliable sources, not just deduced or inferred. Neither the sources nor the article text describes him as a white supremacist. See Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people 208.81.120.26 (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

The 14th Waffen Grenadier Division was created to "fight Bolsheviks". Promoting white supremacy was not part of its charter. The Soviets had killed millions of his countrymen in the Holodomor, taken over Ukrainian territory, and carted some of his family off to Siberia. That was sufficient motivation for him to join. Why add an undocumented claim of white supremacy? Yfff (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

1. The waffen SS were nazis in the literal sense of the word

2. He lived in poland during the holodomor and oh millions of Ukrainians served in the red army.

3. The 14th waffen SS division was created to fight Judeo-bolshevism, which you may know from nazi delusions.

4. How does fighting on the western front fight bolshevism again? Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@Yfff Peddling Holocaust denialist theories demonstrates that you lack the sufficient knowledge of lack of bias to contribute to this matter 84.71.162.183 (talk) 13:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your slander proves nothing. I did not and do not deny that the Nazis killed millions of Jews. If you have evidence that Hunka participated, why don't you present that instead of misrepresenting my words and beliefs?

This article states that "In 1944, Hunka was deployed into combat against Red Army forces on the Eastern Front of World War II." Why are you pretending that he did not fight the Soviet army? That the 1944 Lvov–Sandomierz offensive happened is well-documented and uncontroversial; the operation included the area where the 14th Waffen SS division fought. Yfff (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Everyone in the SS could be utilized to kill Jews wherever they went. A basic level understanding of what the SS was would teach you this. Since you aren’t denying his enthusiastic service in the SS the burden of proof is on YOU to prove he didn’t participate in the activities that the whole SS were participating in. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Only purpose of them is to fight on eastern front/ recruited from people who are from Poland annexed territory or anti-Soviet in their souls. Anyway, Thay can be counted as nazi collaborationist if not as real nazi. 93.106.167.54 (talk) 03:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

I think it would be historically inaccurate to call the Nazis white supremacist in the modern sense of the word. But see also Persecution of black people in Nazi Germany. KetchupSalt (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I agree, no WP:Secondary describes him as "white supermacist"; it's the same as categorising every Red Army soldier as communist. Marcelus (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

He volunteered to join the Waffen SS. if that doesn’t qualify one as a “white supremacist” I don’t know what does. 179.177.243.209 (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your lack of knowledge is not relevant or helpful. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Secondary sources state he volunteed to support the SS Nazi veteran communities while in Canada well into the current times. Since when does a supporter of Nazi organizations in Canada not qualify as a white supremacist... Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:White_Supremacists&action=edit&redlink=1

So would you put all volunteers in the Red Army "Stalinists" and all volunteers in the British army "imperialists" in the categories? BobFromBrockley (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This point is moot, as neither category exists... Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The Waffen SS was different than the regular German army(Wehrmacht). Their raison d’etre was killing minorities. 2804:7F0:A085:80B3:8068:3C30:8B6C:5477 (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

…. Yes? The im sure there existed some red army soldiers who didn’t believe in communism and some British army soldiers who didn’t believe in the British empire but the vast majority most certainly did and even the ones who didn’t were still fundamentally fighting for that ideology. If you think hunka didn’t believe in what he was fighting for then prove it with evidence. Otherwise it’s completely acceptable to characterize Nazis as white supremacists and red army soldiers as communists. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Again, you keep creating a false symmetry between the Red Army and the Waffen SS. The Red Army counterpart was the Wermacht. The SS weren't regular soldiers, they were death squads. 2804:7F0:A085:846E:40C7:FCCE:1706:41B8 (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

That’s true, but also there was an ideological component to all of these armies. Denying it is denying history. People who fought for the Nazis fought for white supremacy and antisemitism until conclusively proven otherwise. People who fought in the red army fought for communism until conclusively proven otherwise. For goodness sake, Rodimtsev is famous for his “I am a communist. I have no intention of abandoning this city.” quote he said when he arrived in Stalingrad. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 14:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Arguing that a literal Nazi war criminal isn't racist is definitely the position that requires evidence. The nazi SS was a racist organization. This is not in dispute. Trying to dispute it is considered a form of Holocaust denial, according to the Wikipedia article on Holocaust denial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.198.146.55 (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

1) Deschênes Commission found the Waffen-SS 14th Galicia Division not guilty of collective war crimes. 2) «White supremacy is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races and thus should dominate them.» Which means - to have this category, - I want to see personal racist statments of Yaroslav Hunka regarding to Jews or Romani people. Шиманський Василь (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I guess my view on the matter is that if someone was a significant member of the KKK, then left the KKK when their local group disbanded, and never made any statements denouncing the KKK or apologizing for their previous views, we wouldn't consider it controversial to tag that person as a white supremacist. I don't see why we'd have a higher standard for members of the Nazi SS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.198.146.55 (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly agree. Active supremacism is not required. A former politician isn't removed from the category of "politicians". Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm so happy that the Deschenes commission didn't find the involvement of the 14th SS division in the Huta Pieniacka massacre, Pidkamin massacre, or the Palikrowy massacre to be 'war crimes', thanks for clearing that up guys! Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

1) The war crime status of these events (which no reliable source has said the subject of this article was involved in) is utterly irrelevant to the question of whether the article should be filed under the "Canadian white supremacist category". Wikipedia policy on categories for biographies is at WP:PEOPLECAT and should be the main reference point for this discussion.

2) Biographies of living (and recently deceased) persons should not attribute crimes to people who have not been convicted of them, and that rule covers talk pages too, so Death Editor 2 should strike their multiple descriptions of the subject of this article as a war criminal - see WP:BLPCRIME. BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

His presence in the unit perpetrating the crimes is historical fact. Requiring a direct source about the crimes that names him individually is ridiculous. Why would it even exist? He was just an enlisted soldier in an eastern front volunteer unit. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

We aren't arguing that he wasn't a white supremacist back in the 1940s, we're arguing that it isn't a relevant description in this current context. There is no indication that he is involved in white supremacist activism. 194.80.168.100 (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

So your argument is that because he was only a white supremacist when he was perpetrating the holocaust he shouldn’t be referred to as a white supremacist? Are you out of your mind? 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Please learn how to contribute to Wikipedia rationally. Your inflammatory and opinionated language is out of place. Generally, if an editor has strong opinions about a subject, they should stay off that page. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

That’s a really poor job at pretending to be an authority on wikipedia 74.109.240.116 (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

"Quick! Burn the records!" - Wikipedia neo-nazis 45.150.230.13 (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

I think we should not include the category Canadian White Supremacists as we have no substantial evidence that Hunka was actively engaged in white supremacy in Canada. He was more involved in the Ukrainian Catholic Church, the aviation sector, and being an ordinary citizen in Canadian society. He flew under the radar in Canada. His connection to white supremacy should be deferred to his involvement with the Waffen-SS and Nazism in Ukraine. Usedbook (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

That's wiki-lawyering, he served the Nazis and then was an advocate for SS veteran communities in Canada. That's your statement - he supported the continuing community of SS soldiers. That's the opposite of renouncing one's views. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Point taken. We should point in the article that he has never publicly renounced ties to the SS and has in fact continued in Canada to glorify the group. The SS was responsible for targeting and murdering millions of people, so not condemning the SS after this would give weight to the White Supremacist label. This needs to be added to the article with citation as supporting evidence. Even something along the lines like, "Canadian political analyst (name here) has argued that Yaroslav Hunka meets the criteria of a... and so forth. Usedbook (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Applying this category is utter nonsense without a reliable source proving that Hunka is a white supremacist. Simply read the article White supremacy – it doesn't somehow apply to Nazi soldiers by definition. Many Nazi soldiers were forced to fight by the circumstances (for example, Austrians who were under the occupation).
Even if all Waffen SS personnel were white supremacists, which is not correct, then Category:Waffen-SS should be simply made subcategory of the category Category:White supremacists and that's it. Otherwise, be consistent and apply similar categories to all articles from Category:Waffen-SS foreign volunteers and conscripts.

For now, I'm removing this category. --Amakuha (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Most Austrians were willing collaborators in the nazi regime, and he was a willing volunteer in the Waffen SS. Did you even read the article at all? Death Editor 2 (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I read the article. But I don't see any claim of white supremacy. Moreover, as I already said, Nazis (unlike neo-Nazis) are not currently categorized as white supremacists in Wikipedia. So you are introducing a completely new concept in a disruptive manner (see WP:WAR). --Amakuha (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I checked the category white supremacists and under the N section it clearly lists 'nazi politicians' as a category. Death Editor 2 (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

How is this relevant? Is Mr. Hunka also a politician now? Will you add the Category:Canadian politicians too? --Amakuha (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

When you join the SS you volunteer to fight for the Nazi party and Nazi politicians. Hope this helps! 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Why would you even *volunteer* to be in the Waffen SS if you are not a white supremacist? Maybe he just liked their uniforms? They were designed by Hugo Boss you know. 2804:7F0:A085:80B3:8068:3C30:8B6C:5477 (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

There could be many reasons. One reason is that he was anti-stalinist and anti-communist. You know what Stalin did to Ukraine, do you? Holodomor of 1932–1933 killed millions of Ukrainians. A tragedy on par with Holocaust for the Jews. This made communists as bad, if not worse, than the Nazis to many Ukrainians. In that light, it makes no sense why you'd want to add Hunka to Category:Canadian white supremacists specifically, but not, let's say, Category:Canadian anti-communists.

In any case, we should not even discuss such matters. In Wikipedia we should simply follow what secondary reliable sources state about Hunka and not add any new claims, however logical they might seem to someone. --Amakuha (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Millions of ukrainians who lived through the Holodomor, joined the red army as opposed to the waffen SS or the UPA, so I find that hard to believe. Death Editor 2 (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

What you do or don't believe is irrelevant. All your comments on this page are about your beliefs. Editors should stay off pages that they have strong beliefs about. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

It's just literal holocaust denial on the wikipedia talk page lmfaooooo 2603:6080:E40:5A6:7D48:98B9:BCE1:8D80 (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Very clear holocaust denial from user:amakuha 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

These accusations violate Wikipedia policy. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

This person is pretending to be an authority from Wikipedia and is attempting to threaten users who are speaking out against Nazism being spread in this talk page. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Stop spreading Holocaust denialism please. KetchupSalt (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Stop Holodomor denial.

Also, Hunka himself wrote about Stalin's oppression in his 2011 letter. Some of his relatives, classmates and a teacher were sent to Siberia in January 1940 and died there. --Amakuha (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Huh. TIL Stalin did not kill millions of people. Good to know, thanks! --Pish1le (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

The article goes into those reasons ... perhaps you should read it. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Because it was an opportunity to kill Russians. A lot of people in the area were highly motivated to do that at the time. Similarly India had a lot of Nazi sympathisers not because they had feelings about Jews but because they fought against the British. Similarly, Churchill and Roosevelt allied with Stalin not because they hated Ukrainians but because they fought the Nazis. War compromises everyone, and if your haven't lived it then you should just STFU. --Pish1le (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

The red army had ukrainians in it too you know. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

And the British army had Indians in it. That didn't stop the Indian Legion and Indian National Army from aligning with Germany and Japan. Do you accuse all the Indians who fought for the British in WW2 of supporting imperialism and British-wrought famine in their own country? --Pish1le (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

far more indians served in the british army than in the Indian Legion or Indian National Army so I don't know what your point is, and no i'm not. Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Well what's your point? That majority rule proves that all Indians liked their lot under British rule and all Ukrainians liked their lot under Soviet rule and so anybody who acted differently was clearly motivated by white supremacy? That Indians were motivated by white supremacy? --Pish1le (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Why are you trying to defend a literal nazi? Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm asking what's basis your have for your beliefs. If your answer is "Why are you defending a Nazi?" then it's pretty clear that you have no basis for your beliefs because you can't reason them through. --Pish1le (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

My basis is that i'm anti-nazi and you are currently defending a nazi. Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Well I hope you can manage to keep your political agenda out of Wikipedia. Good luck! --Pish1le (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

you are currently imposing your much worse political agenda on wikipedia, and remember Wikipedia:No Nazis Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Maybe go read Don Quixote before you carry on with that. --Pish1le (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Why are you defending a nazi? Answer the question this time. Death Editor 2 (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

the Nazis weren’t racist????

clean SS myth? Bro can’t see reality 47.40.177.156 (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Do you also believe it necessary to independently verify, e.g., whether each individual member of the KKK is a white supremacist before labeling them such? 2600:1011:B163:DCC:3963:C925:35B:1CDE (talk) 03:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, actually, otherwise it's a violation of BLP. And editors should not be labeling anyone ... that's what sources are for. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

No it is not. This is an insane take on BLP policy by an anonymous IP whose only edits were to this talk page. Do not spout nonsense. BLP policies are to be approached with reasonable understandings, not as an absolute reading of text. BLP policy does not state that you cannot call a spade a spade if a reliable source does not explicitly say it. White supremacy is a subset of Nazism; you are making a bogus claim about Wikipedia policy akin to "BLP policy states that you cannot call a murderer a criminal unless a reliable source calls the murderer a criminal". Yue🌙 05:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

I think it's clear example of association fallacy, we need a WP:Secondary source that clearly determine Hunka had white supermacist views. Marcelus (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

He joined an organization that promoted white supremacy. That fact is not in dispute. The burden is on you to prove he DISAGREED with the ideology he was fighting for. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

It's not just looking at the Waffen SS for dealing with ideology, because far more important would be Hunka's views on Bandera and Stetsko, and i think their ideologies are far more important. post-1945

What organizations did Hunka belong to,what magazines and newsletters did he read?

When Stetsko visited Canada in 1967, he was made an honorary citizen of Winnipeg.

Even the CIA felt he was too dangerous to work with, should tell you something. 2604:3D08:9B77:AB00:6463:74EC:1B2D:28B0 (talk) 05:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Stetsko was a close friend of OUN-B founder Stepan Bandera. Like Bandera he was a militant anti-Semite equating Marxism with Judaism, while calling for the extermination of both. Even after the war, when his American bosses forced him to soften his public statements, he still called for an "ethnically pure" Ukraine, purged of Jews, Poles and Russians.

Diploma of honorary citizen awarded on 22 October 1966 by the city of Winnipeg to Ukrainian Nazi Prime Minister Yaroslav Stetsko.

Many historians find the post-1945 ideologies within the emigre communities to be far more disturbing than collaborating with the Nazis or joining the SS.

And the issue is more of Ukrainian and German fascist viewpoints that go into communities more than just merely being a soldier in the SS. 2604:3D08:9B77:AB00:14CD:FA80:E3B:17B8 (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Will editors devote their time to psycho-analyze the motives of every notable Nazi Party member, soldier in their wiki page and try to find the 'noble' reasons behind their actions? Alexi Capac (talk) 13:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

He joined the war effort as a Nazi Waffen SS. That's about as white supremacist as it gets. 2601:1C1:8582:5E90:3122:9A25:69EB:C3F2 (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

To cite a relevant Wikipedia guideline (see WP:PEOPLECAT):

In general, categories of articles about people must be: ... Verifiable – Do not categorize people based upon deduction, inference... Doing so would be original research. Inclusion of people in a category must be based on verifiability from reliable sources.

So the question still stands: a reliable secondary source is required for the supremacist claim. --Amakuha (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I have replaced the canadian white supremacist category with a much more accurate one. Death Editor 2 (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The reliable source is the source which shows him fighting for a white supremacist cause. You don’t need another source saying last week he called a black person a bad name. His participation in white supremacy is all that is needed to call him a white supremacist. Regardless if you want to tell yourself he joined the SS to “fight communism”, he was still fighting for a white supremacist and anti-Semitic army. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

That's not what Wikipedia means by a reliable source. If you're here to fight Nazis rather than follow Wikipedia guidelines then you're in the wrong place. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

The reliable source is the source that demonstrates his presence in the Nazi volunteer unit. If you want to dispute that you are more than welcome. If you’re here to fight for Ukraine then you’re in the wrong place. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 20:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Wholeheartedly agree with this. Utterly bizarre to see people arguing that a member of the literal SS couldn't be described as a white supremacist. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I think it's far more useful to speculate on what unit Hunka was in, and what engagements on the battlefield they were in.

He may not be involved in any massacres, but I think his post-war views on the far-right Ukrainian nationalist movement or his relations with other Ukrainians in the Waffen SS in veteran reunions are probably more important.

One thing that's not mentioned in that Hunka's views were influenced by his uncle, who i believe was pro-German.

It may just be that some viewed the Germans as a civilized nation, more so under Hitler than Stalin, though you really wonder if they ever read Mein Kampf, if they ever hoped to feel that the Nazis would 'liberate' them. 2604:3D08:9B77:AB00:C5B2:9A47:FA20:7987 (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

It seems like if you joined a group because you wanted to fight Soviets, and you later live in a country that spent decades in a cold war with Soviets and let people speak freely against that regime, you wouldn't think it so wrong to associate with others who were also in the same group fighting for the same anti-Soviet cause as you were.

Without any further context I wondered if this was why a Nazi might be so willing to hide in plain view, and be so bold as to show up on TV to be called out for their role in the war.

I came to wikipedia for that context but was sorely disappointed. You seem to have some. Where did you learn about his uncle? --Pish1le (talk) 06:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

I don't think those murdered poles were soviets. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

"Nazi fugitive"

@Death Editor 2: Don't play WP:CRYSTAL, please. To become a "Nazi fugitive" he'd need to stand trial and be found guilty. That never happened.

And extradition request is non-existent. Just one controversial Polish politician tweeted that "he'd make steps for extradition". He, allegedly, asked Polish historians to look into it and check if Hunka is known to have committed any crimes. – This is very far from an actual extradition request. --Amakuha (talk) 00:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

That's not quite accurate

In a letter to Poland’s Institute of National Remembrance, a body that researches and investigates past crimes against the Polish nation, Czarnek asked it to “urgently examine” whether Hunka is wanted for crimes against Polish people of Jewish origin, adding that “signs of such crimes are grounds to apply to Canada for his extradition.”

Canada's comment was that

"commenting on early stages of an extradition process is not appropriate"

So where is the alleged part in this story?

And the education minister is no less controversial than the Prime Minister since they are both in the same far right Law and Justice party.

In the end, there isn't much objectivity by Polish nationalists or Ukrainian nationalists when it comes to historical accuracy. 2604:3D08:9B77:AB00:6463:74EC:1B2D:28B0 (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Forum-style and personalised beef

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. why are you so eager to defend a nazi war criminal? Death Editor 2 (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Those that want to erase this event are Holocaust Denier. 73.156.186.198 (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Why are you repeatedly violating Wikipedia policy? You seem to have no idea what editing Wikipedia is about. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a place for you to spread Nazism sir. 74.109.240.116 (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Such charges are a violation of Wikipedia policy. You seem to have no idea what Wikipedia is actually a place for. 2600:8802:571B:E00:C144:740A:EC8F:778A (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.