Talk:Y-12 National Security Complex

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic What the heck? redux

What...the heck? edit

The current version of this article reads like a promotional piece. Was it copied and pasted directly from a government website?

Examples of some of the things that I believe should be changed or removed to move towards NPOV:

  • "The Y-12 National Security Complex is a premier manufacturing facility dedicated to making the United States and the world a safer place. Operated by BWXT Y‑12 for the National Nuclear Security Administration, Y‑12 plays a vital role in the Department of Energy's Nuclear Weapons Complex."
  • "Y‑12 applies unique expertise, initially developed for highly specialized military purposes, to a wide range of manufacturing problems to support the capabilities of the U.S. industrial base. Y‑12’s all-inclusive expertise includes proceeding from concept, through detailed design and specification, to building prototypes and configuring integrated manufacturing processes."
  • "Y‑12's mission is to meet the needs of the U.S. Department of Energy, the NNSA, other government agencies, and private industry through a commitment to excellence in the use of a technology-based manufacturing center."

Does anyone else agree that this article needs *major* work to move towards NPOV? --Takeel 01:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, what do you know? Some parts of the article read like a government website copy-and-paste because that's what those parts are: http://www.y12.doe.gov/about/factsheet.php I will remove what I can identify from this website. --Takeel 02:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
More copied from here: http://www.y12.doe.gov/about/history.php Still working on it now. --Takeel 02:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
...aaaand, it looks like all revisions are copy-paste jobs from .gov sites. This is going to be a big job. Would anyone mind if I stub-ify this article and start from scratch? --Takeel 02:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The article is totally POV and Takeel has my support in trying to make it NPOV. Rick Norwood 15:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Agreed. I'm OK with "stubify and start from scratch". AED 07:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely! Nuke it and rebuild. - DavidWBrooks 14:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stubification comlplete edit

Per discussion on this talk page, I have stubified the article. I hope there is some interest in rebuilding this article beyond just me, but I will work on it as inspiration comes! --Takeel 18:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

...and thanks to those who commented on my POV dispute. --Takeel 18:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Contamination type edit

What kinds of contamination is present at Y-12? --Abdull (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Principally uranium, mercury, and organic solvents. --Orlady (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Y-12 National Security Complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

What the heck? redux edit

I wanted to complain that this reads like a promotional piece, and I see someone has already complained about this. I came to this article from other sources on the web which say that the Colex plant was responsible for a historic amount of mercury emissions. As long as this info isn't prominent, I wonder whether this article is being supervised by defense contractors ... Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article needs a lot of work. Possible sources include Y-12: Poster child for a dysfunctional nuclear weapons complex History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Y-12 mercury losses. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply