Talk:Warnbro railway station

Fair use rationale for Image:NewMetroRail logo.svg

Image:NewMetroRail logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Warnbro railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll look at this tomorrow when I am more awake! — GhostRiver 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• No comma needed after "with seven bus stands"
• "The station was known as Waikiki station during planning. The station was included" → "Known as Waikiki station during planning, the station was included"

Description

• First instance of "Transperth" in the body should be linked
• No comma needed after "transit officer booth"

Public art

• No comma needed after "with help from TUES"

History

• "was planned on only being single track" → "was only intended to be single track"
• No comma needed after "spur off the Armadale line"
• "These changes caused the predicted patronage at Waikiki station to be lower." → 'These changes lowered the predicted patronage at Waikiki station."
• "between Perth and Waikiki to be opened"

Services

• "2013-14 financial year" → "2013–14 financial year"

References

• Good

General comments

• Photos are properly licensed and relevant
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Earwig score looks good

All minor changes! Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 17:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for doing this review @GhostRiver:. I have made all the changes you requested. Steelkamp (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 15:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)