Talk:Viviania

Agree to merger with Viviania

Cissarobryon Kunze ex Poepp., First published in Fragm. Syn. Pl.: 29 (1833) This name is a synonym of Viviania from PlantsoftheWorld (Kew) https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:16794-1 Also american GRIN agrees synonyn status https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomygenus?id=14010

DavidAnstiss (talk) 11:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I was just about to say that, I agree. However, why not a redirect since its a synonym? BloxyColaSweet (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, merge (BloxyColaSweet, merging typical means turning into a redirect). However, there isn't really any content in Cissarbryon that needs to be merged. But Francoaceae could do a rewrite/expansion (there's barely any content there, and what's there is wrong with respect to the current circumscription; Francoaceae isn't endemic to Chile, and includes woody species). Plantdrew (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Cissarbryon is a synonym of Viviania, So I would agree on merging Cissarbryon onto Viviania with a redirect. I could get started on that now, however whats the issue? BloxyColaSweet (talk) 05:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

I already merged Cissarobryon to Viviania, however, like Plantdrew said, I don't see what content needs to me merged with Viviania, so I just made a redirect. BloxyColaSweet (talk) 03:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I felt like my decision was disruptive. BloxyColaSweet (talk) 03:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)