Talk:V Australia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Erm, I thought Sydney was announced as the HQ? 03:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.22.17.216 (talk)

Melbourne Services edit

Isn't the recently announced new services on 17th August, 2009 a delay on the Melbourne to Los Angeles Service. It was orginally scheduled to start on 15th September, 2009. Can anyone confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by M i k e y 86 (talkcontribs) 09:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, just look at their past media releases. There are several mentions of Melbourne services starting in September, three times a week. I don't think this is particularly notable. -- Rob.au (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

So it's now not starting till 1 December? Anyone know why it was delayed? It beacause they started Phuket services

Destination/Fleet edit

Do they actually have 4000 destination and 70 aircraft? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.237.57.58 (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ummm, I don't think so. Read this wikipedia page and you shall find out. -Compdude123 (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article edit

This whole article needs re-writing. i have updated some of the airlines recent history RE: new destinations also removed outdated content Schulzr (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Whats the situation edit

Hi. I am under the impression that V Australia is now defunct and that the aircraft are used for an international arm in Virgin Australia. From what i have seen the actual airline hasnt been renamed. If this is the case this article should be named V Australia and there sould be a section about international travel in Virgin Australia. Please can someone throw some light on this? --JetBlast (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am under the same impression. All aircraft are operated by Virgin Australia now...all registered to the same name on the CASA register...therefore they should be under the same article Schulzr (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree on that part. Their website states that the 777-300ER is now in the Virgin Australia fleet. →εϻαdιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 11:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I concur; V Australia and Pacific Blue have been "operating under the Virgin Australia banner" since 7 December, quite a while after the renaming of Virgin Blue to Virgin Australia. I agree with JetBlast's comment about mentioning international travel in Virgin Australia and, to add a thought of mine, the history of all these airlines should be clearly documented in the article for the readers to mitigate confusion. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 22:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
It is probably appropriate to change the title back to V Australia to detail the history of the airline. The current title appears to be made up and probably not suitable for an article of the defunct airline. MilborneOne (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The whole V Australia article is gone now. I am not sure whats going on with the Virgin Australia thing but its all gone messy. I am currently on holiday for a month so i cant do much about it. Maybe someone could assist please? --JetBlast (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I Have removed references to "Virgin Australia Long Haul International" and replaced with V Australia. The article should read as if it's about an airline that once existed and no longer does (which is technically true). The logo at the top should be reverted back to the V australia logo and article title changed back to just plain "V australia". Schulzr (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Moved the article back to V Australia and put back the original logo, still might need some work to put stuff in the past tense. MilborneOne (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Documents edit

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on V Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on V Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply