Talk:Traverse (climbing)
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
 | Traverse (climbing) is currently a Other sports good article nominee. Nominated by Aszx5000 (talk) at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: Section of lateral movement on a climbing route |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 11:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
( )
The El Capitan Girdle Traverse spans the full width of El Capitan in Yosemite
- ... that the world's longest continuous rock climbing route is a horizontal 4,500-metre (14,800 ft) traverse, known as the El Capitan Girdle Traverse?
- Reviewed:
5x expanded by Aszx5000 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Aszx5000 (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC).
article was not expanded 5x within the previous 7 days before it was nominated on June 2. Looking at the edit history of the article, the nomination would have had to have been done sometime in mid-May to be eligible. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007:, sorry but I didn't realise DYK even existed up until a short while ago, and am disappointed that a lot of articles that I expanded 5-10x since I got a full account are not eligible due to the deadline, but I thought that this one might still be allowed to squeeze in? thanks Aszx5000 (talk) 08:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Aszx5000, I understand your frustration. The DYK criteria give reviewers a little leeway on the 7 day deadline, but not weeks. That said, if you can get this promoted to WP:GA, it becomes eligible for DYK again, just make sure you get the nomination in quickly after promotion. Also, please remember that a lack of Main Page recognition doesn't take away at all from the great improvement you made to the article! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for that. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Aszx5000, if you do take it to GA, let me know. I have a lot of GA reviews under my belt and happen to be an avid rock climber, so I would be happy to review it for you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gonzo_fan2007, much appreciated and I actually have Traverse (climbing) in the GA queue, along with a few other climbing articles that I have been overhauling for the last few months. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Aszx5000, if you do take it to GA, let me know. I have a lot of GA reviews under my belt and happen to be an avid rock climber, so I would be happy to review it for you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for that. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Aszx5000, I understand your frustration. The DYK criteria give reviewers a little leeway on the 7 day deadline, but not weeks. That said, if you can get this promoted to WP:GA, it becomes eligible for DYK again, just make sure you get the nomination in quickly after promotion. Also, please remember that a lack of Main Page recognition doesn't take away at all from the great improvement you made to the article! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007:, sorry but I didn't realise DYK even existed up until a short while ago, and am disappointed that a lot of articles that I expanded 5-10x since I got a full account are not eligible due to the deadline, but I thought that this one might still be allowed to squeeze in? thanks Aszx5000 (talk) 08:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)