Talk:Tornadogenesis

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 24.214.114.52 in topic Needs to be updated a bit

Untitled edit

There are some sections here that are difficult to understand for non-experts and require expansion. eg. "They form during the growth stage of convective clouds by the ingestion and tightening of boundary layer vorticity by the cumuliform tower's updraft."Shorvath 06:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Why is there an updraft?: The presence of an updraft is invoked to explain developments in the following sentence of the article without explaining why or how an updraft should exist in this situation: "As the mesocyclone lowers below the cloud base, it begins to take in cool, moist air from the downdraft region of the storm. This convergence of warm air in the updraft,....". As a naive reader, I find this confusing. This also occurs in the "Tornado" article. Nkennington (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Research edit

It would be nice to see a reference to Western Universities new WindEEE facility, although I'm not sure how best to add it to this article. http://www.eng.uwo.ca/windeee It is the worlds first hexagonal wind tunnel and will be able to reproduce (simulate) up to EF3 tornadoes. Jarod (talk) 12:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tornadogenesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tornadogenesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some section rearranging. edit

I've moved the "Landspout" section to make it a subsection of "Waterspout" in here. This seems like a more sensible way to structure the article because a full discussion of "Landspout" makes little sense without having "Waterspout" as an anchor, since the two are intrinsically related. If anyone thinks this is a mistake, feel free to change it - I do think, however, that "Landspout" would be better coming after "Waterspout," even if it's promoted to the same level heading.

Sleddog116 (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Needs to be updated a bit edit

Thanks to new doppler radar technology (mobile and fixed), many things have been discovered and proven about tornadoes in the last 10 years. Also, some of the things in the article have been proven to not be true. 24.214.114.52 (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply