Talk:Tom Price (actor)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tom Price (actor) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broken links edit
The reference to his CV no longer works. I've removed the link to the same page which was in 'external links' but I can't work out how to edit the references section. A quick look at his personal website suggests he might have a new agent and those link to his CV were on his previous agent's website Adagio67 (talk) 16:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- New agent is http://www.independenttalent.com Anthony Cope (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
I've begun a discussion on the Monmouth School Talkpage regarding the criteria for including alumni. You may wish to contribute. For ease, I've reproduced the entry below. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Alumni revisited edit
In the discussion above, it was suggested a minimum criteria for inclusion as an alumni would be that the subject has their own Wikipedia entry. I actually wonder whether this is sufficient. Looking at a number of the Sporting and Arts and Entertainment alumni, their Wikipedia articles are of very poor quality. They are often short, poorly referenced - if referenced at all, and a number have all the hallmarks of autobiographical entries, created either by their subjects, or by collaborators. That said, I fully appreciate the very great difficulties of deciding on alternative criteria. Hence, I'd appreciate others' thoughts. KJP1 (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)