Talk:Timeline of volcanism on Earth

More useful edit

It might be more useful to present this information in a chart so that users can sort by date, name (alphabetic), Volcanic Explosivity Index, volume of tephra.

Might be, but I do not know how to do that, and Volcanic Explosivity Index is only completely available on the Holocene. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Global Volcanism Program, Smithsonian Institution [1] is complete over the Holocene epoch, it has all large eruptions VEI 4 listed. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Maybe you could copy the format from another article. OR look here. --Guanlong wucaii 12:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thx. Didn't know you can do this on the client side too. I want to try to built a summary, in a Client-based self-sorting table. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 10:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Scope edit

The lead sentence says that only VEI-6 eruptions are included, but several LIPs and hotspots have been added, with no evidence that these have produced large explosive eruptions. Should we include them? (If so, the lead sentence should reflect this.) -- Avenue (talk) 09:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I know. In the Holocene, all VEI-6 are included, and the Eldgjá eruption, because the sulfur dioxide emission resulted in a Volcanic winter. Before Holocene, all Wiki VEI-6, VEI-7, VEI-8 are included. Yellowstone and Laacher See too, research never ends... work in progress... In the end, there are some LIPs because of their sulfur dioxide emission, and some important Hotspots, to give an idea of the time scales. I'm thinking how to formulate a wise lead sentence. Before the Holocene, it is difficult to find facts. I think Yellowstone hotspot, Eifel hotspot, Santorini and Taupo Volcanic Zone are very regular, and endanger heavy populated areas, so their large eruptions should be included too. It is assumed that an eruption before the Holocene must be very large to be still noticed by us. The Holocene is a very short period of time to get an overview of the colossal eruptions. The large igneous provinces are important too, the main point is a timetable of potential climate cooling through sulfur dioxide emission resulted by volcanic activity. The idea behind is Yellowstone, and its alarming earthquake swarms. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Maybe, someday, somebody can link the North and South Poles ice core sulfuric acid spikes with each volcanic Sulfur Dioxide emission. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Topic paragraph edit

I've enjoyed watching this article emerge, but I think a topic paragraph is needed. The current leading paragraph explains the data limits, exclusions, etc., but does not summarize or focus the information for the reader. Obviously, major volcanic eruptions significantly impacts the earth's geology, climate and biosphere. But what else should the article say? Chris.urs-o, did you have a specific goal for this article/list? What were your objectives here? Best wishes. WBardwin (talk) 08:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well this is a list, I'm still fighting to get data, and references before Holocene. As every list, it needs to be kept "manageable". The GVP list of large eruptions (greater than VEI 3) is only over the Holocene, and the time frame must be much longer for an overview of eruptions greater than VEI 5. I wanted an overview, as the Yellowstone shows earthquake swarms and San Francisco waits for the "big one" (1906 + 101 years). The specific goal is VEI and sulfur dioxide emissions and volcanic winter relationship, I assume. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you are right, I have a topic problem. Maybe, I tried to make two lists in one. This list focus on VEI 6 eruptions or larger or equivalent sulfur dioxide emission, the background is to list eruptions relevant for global cooling. Another list would be the eruptive history of VEI 5 eruptions or larger that endanger many people, so Decade Volcanoes (Avachinsky-Koryaksky, Kamchatka; Colima, Jalisco and Colima; Mount Etna, Sicily; Galeras, Nariño; Mauna Loa, Hawaii; Mount Merapi, Central Java; Mount Nyiragongo, Great Rift Valley; Mount Rainier, Washington; Sakurajima, Kagoshima Prefecture; Santamaria/Santiaguito, Central America Arc; Santorini, Cyclades; Taal Volcano, Luzon Arc; Teide, Canary Islands; Ulawun, New Britain; Mount Unzen, Nagasaki Prefecture; Vesuvius, Naples), Pinatubo, Toba, Mount Meager, Yellowstone hotspot, and Taupo Volcanic Zone. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

A list of earthquakes and eruptions of the last hundred years is another possibility. As strong earthquakes break open a leak on magma chambers under pressure limits and strong earthquakes are linked to relative movements between two tectonic plates. A big movement on one side of the Pacific Ring of Fire creates a strong strain on the other side of the Pacific Ring of Fire, a Lever law. I hope I'm right, though. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

9.2, Alaska (1964): Good Friday Earthquake; 9.5, Chile (1960): Great Chilean Earthquake; 7.9, San Francisco (1906): 1906 San Francisco earthquake; 9.3, Sumatra (2004): 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake; 8.8, Chile (2010): 2010 Chile earthquake; Image:Graph of largest earthquakes 1906-2005.png

List seems to never end edit

"Supplementary Table to P.L. Ward, Thin Solid Films (2009) Major volcanic eruptions and provinces" (PDF). Teton Tectonics. Retrieved 2010-03-16. got 128 eruptions with erupted volume between Miocene and before Holocene, and 99 events in the Holocene. I just have 140 eruptions and 5 VEI eruptions. :( --Chris.urs-o (talk) 19:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC) This page might get 80 kbytes long and 100 references, is it ok? --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I just checked one entry that seemed dubious to me, that for the Uzon-Geizernaya twinned caldera. According to Ward, this 9 km x 18 km caldera resulted from an eruption about 40,000 years ago that produced 1,700 km³ of ejecta. That didn't seem right to me: the caldera seems much too small for that tephra volume. Looking around, I see that people seem to roughly agree on the caldera size (e.g. 16 x 10km here), so the problem could be the volume. The "WEB1" reference in Ward could be the problem's source: it talks of the associated ignimbrite sheet covering "an area of 1700 km³ [sic]". The Smithsonian's listing for Uzon says the ignimbrite deposits "cover an area of 1700 sq km" and have a volume of 20-25 km³, so Ward's volume does seem to be badly wrong. If Ward's table incorporates errors of this magnitude, I wouldn't place too much reliance on it. --Avenue (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'll try to keep an eye on it. But I do not have the time and money to check all Ward's references :( --Chris.urs-o (talk) 17:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Braitseva et al. (1995), Leonov (2003), Fedotov+Masurenkov (1991), WEB1
    • "Ages of calderas, large explosive craters and active volcanoes in the Kuril-Kamchatka region, Russia". Bull. Volcanol. 57: 383–402. 1995. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
    • "Quaternary calderas of Kamchatka Overview, classification, structural position". Volcanol. Seismol. (in Russian). 2: 13–26. 2003. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
    • Active Volcanoes of Kamchatka. Vol. VI, 302 pp., VII, 415pp. Moscow: Nauka. 1991. {{cite book}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  • I do not habe access to these papers and I can't russian. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 10:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Never forget, Ward listed the eruptions just for its paper about world climate. He had probably problems too with data about the russian part of the Pacific Ring of Fire. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete List edit

Hi all, can you help add the volcanic eruption in Hong Kong in around 140 million years ago onto this list?

= edit

This article does not list the major eruptions that have occurred between the start of the Holocene and 1 C.E. Several VEI-7 eruptions such as the Minoan eruption of Santorini in about 1610 BCE and the Mazama eruption about 5700 BCE. As stated above, the Smithsonian's Global Volcanism Program web site has a page listing large Holocene eruptions: [2]. S Martin (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

There is a main template at the section begin ;) This list got too long. They are actually three lists (Timetable of major worldwide volcanic eruptions, List of Quaternary volcanic eruptions, and Large volume volcanic eruptions in the Basin and Range Province‎) and one sortable summary (List of large volcanic eruptions‎). The Minoan eruption and Mount Mazama are on the List of Quaternary volcanic eruptions‎ ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Things were easier at the beginning. Wikipedia: Supervolcanoes, Volcanic Explosivity Index, Category:VEI-8 volcanoes, Category:VEI-7 volcanoes, and Category:VEI-6 volcanoes, GVP, and Mason, Ben G.; Pyle, David M.; Oppenheimer, Clive (2004). Then I got Peter Langdon Ward's table (2009), and things are more complicated now. A "never ending list" and many references. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hm.. ResMar 19:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I notice that Krakatoa is vaguely suggested for Extreme_weather_events_of_535–536AD I don't see a listing an eruption at that time, is that just missed ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardLane (talkcontribs) 11:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

No. Even the Article linked to the winter of 536AD says today that boring the sediments of sunda street show no evidence whatesoever for a major volcanic event involving Krakatoa in or around 536AD. The evidence found by archeologist David Keys could have been traced to an event around 416 AD. So the Krakatao hypothesis as a cause of the 536 AD events (and the years following) is clearly outdated. ChiefOBrian (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091205105844.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.241.146 (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

List of volcano eruptions edit

I redirected this here, but this list seems poor. Where are modern volcano eruptions? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Timeline of volcanism on Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Timeline of volcanism on Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of volcanism on Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please update with "Volcanoes and Climate: Sizing up the Impact of the Recent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption from a Historical Perspective" edit

Please add this info the the article. I featured it in 2022 in science, currently like so:

Atmospheric scientists report that the 2022 volcano eruption in Tonga, Pacific Ocean – the largest recorded volcanic eruption since 1991 which reportedly cooled global climate by ~0.6°C during 15 months[1] – did not have a cooling effect (volcanic winter) of significance to global climate change (i.e. a cooling of ~0.004°C during the first year).[2][3]

Moreover, in the table there please also check and add a reference to the claim that the Mount Pinatubo lead to "Global temperature fell by 0.4 °C" – the reference I used above said around 0.6°C and not 0.4°C.

Somebody should also update 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai eruption and tsunami where I asked about this on the talk page. I'd like to avoid adding it myself, for example because I'm not that knowledgeable on volcanism / volcanoes.

I think it would be good if there was a brief note at the (currently missing) entry at List of large volcanic eruptions.

References

  1. ^ "Global Effects of Mount Pinatubo". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 15 June 2001. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  2. ^ Ramirez, Rachel; Miller, Brandon. "Tonga volcano eruption likely not large enough to affect global climate, experts say". CNN. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  3. ^ Zuo, Meng; Zhou, Tianjun; Man, Wenmin; Chen, Xiaolong; Liu, Jian; Liu, Fei; Gao, Chaochao (1 March 2022). "Volcanoes and Climate: Sizing up the Impact of the Recent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption from a Historical Perspective". Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. doi:10.1007/s00376-022-2034-1. ISSN 1861-9533.

Prototyperspective (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Clickable imagemap needs updating edit

Does anyone know how to update this map? There are a few noteworthy eruptions missing and some of the volumes shown on the map are incorrect Mrmp2402 (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Campi Flegrei is wrong, some major historic volcanoes are missing edit

Major fault of this article is it got wrong one of the most important eruption today. Neapolitan Yellow Tuff is around 15 ka years old, not millions (Ma)! Also, it would be great to include for example Stiavnica volcano (today Slovakia; estimated volume >350km3 or Teplice-Altenberg caldera (Czech republic and Germany; estimated volume >150km3) . Patmull (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply