Talk:The Incentive

Latest comment: 11 years ago by TBrandley in topic GA Review
Good articleThe Incentive has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Incentive is part of the The Office (American season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 7, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Incentive/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Infobox: Use {{start date}} in templates for dates
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Infobox: No guest stars?
    Unfortunately, no one big enough.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Infobox: Link The Office?
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Lede: Unlink television series per WP:OVERLINK
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Lede: Same goes for showrunner
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Lede: NBC → the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), as per MOS:ACRO
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Plot: Direct quotes need actual references
    I think I fixed this.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Production: "The official website for The Office" don't think that is important to subject. Perhaps remove.
    I kept it, as its in all the other articles. If I removed it, it would make no sense, and readers would question whether they were leaked or officially released.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Cultural references: Seems small. Expand, or merge with production
    It's a paragraph-sized section, and production and cultural references are two different things.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Reception: "%" → "percent"
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Reviews: Seems quotey. Consider paraphrasing, etc.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • I did a little copy-edit, please check it, which had some typos
    Looks good.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • That's all, on hold for now. Good work.
  • TBrandley 03:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Think I got everything. Thank you!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Yep. Article looks good now. Passing. Well done! TBrandley 03:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply