Talk:Tom Clancy's The Division

PC

The game is coming to PC: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/08/20/look-what-we-can-post-about-the-division/ 86.129.221.132 (talk) 10:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, this has been added. Samwalton9 (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Description Wrong?

I don't remember them saying the whole United States fell, just New York City. Where did that information come from? --68.172.39.23 (talk) 19:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

The status of this game is delayed to 2015 not cancelled. http://www.pcgamer.com/tom-clancys-the-division-delayed-to-2015/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.23.224.233 (talk) 01:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

New Information

In one game magazine I have founded some bad news… Game was delayed until 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.188.16.2 (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

What virus?

The introduction is incomplete - or incorrect. It says "The player's mission is to restore order by investigating the source of the virus". But it fails to mention any virus! It is also illogical - investigating the source of a virus will not stop it, much less restore order. And then there are references to enemies. But who are the enemies? Is this a zombie game, or are these North Koreans, or ISIS?Royalcourtier (talk) 05:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

It's just a game plot Grayhouser (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

reception

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/the-division-is-ubisofts-fastest-selling-game/1100-6435509/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majinsnake (talk • contribs) 23:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC) Majinsnake (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Plot expansion

The plot needs to be expanded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talk • contribs) 19:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Done!158.123.252.2 (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

First Person Shooters?

The reception section refers to The Division and Destiny as First Person Shooters. These should be corrected to be Third Person Shooters as the perspective is behind the player's avatar and not through the avatar's eyes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capntom13 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Someone corrected that. Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Reception on Steam

I find it weird that the article mentions only positive reviews. Its score on Steam is 29/100, with many players complaining about cheaters, grind, bugs etc. Considering Steam score went from 59/100 overall to 29/100 recent, I think it's worth mentioning. Athari (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

User reviews are not verifiable and generally not used as a source. See WP:VG/USERREVIEW. --SubSeven (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Sure about that? Loads of film articles use Rotten Tomatoes as a source, which uses user reviews.213.40.55.89 (talk) 10:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes gives critic scores and user scores. Generally, Wikipedia will use the critical scores only. If somewhere the user score is being used, then that should be removed from the article. --SubSeven (talk) 12:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Game Engine

How do we mention it's engine is Snowdrop in the info-box without it being removed by other users? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎2607:fea8:a4c0:5d:1817:4904:d476:fdf8 (talk • contribs)

It's being removed because Template:Infobox_video_game#Syntax guide says only to include game engines with "an established, independent article". So, if you really want to include Snowdrop, then firstly, you should start discussion on the talk page of that specific template. -- ChamithN (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

"Roleplaying game"??

In what sense is this a roleplaying game (any more than, say, Call of Duty multiplayer)? 194.193.210.134 (talk) 23:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)