Talk:The Butterfly Effect (band)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Butterfly Effect (band) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled edit
Whoever wrote this obviously likes the band, it's very subjective. I would say the band has a very mainstream sound compared to other heavy acts and this has contributed to their mainstream popularity.
- I don't particularly see much appraisal of the band's sound on the page Mwhale 17:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Copyvios not on edit
Hi anon eds. This article is starting to shape up nicely. You guys are starting to get the right idea - why not consider getting an account? Also, please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Obvious starstruck fanlove is not on. Try to make the content as objective as possible.
Secondly, Wikipedia:Copyright is a huge issue and copying whole slabs of info from other sites, even the official site, is not on. Even when you make slight adaptions to it, like changing the order and a few words. Even when you put an attribution. Still not on. You can refer to it, of course, but write your own stuff. I just rewrote the History and Current sections. Other editors may not be so patient and will simply slap a Copyvio statement on them, or more likely than not, just remove them.
If you have any comments about what I've said, please drop a line on my Talk page or this page. pfctdayelise 11:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
Genre? edit
Hard Rock, Emo? This is just plain wrong. Can someone edit this. They are Hard Rock, Nu-Metal or just plain Rock/Metal. They are in no way 'Emo'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.154.82 (talk)
They're not nu metal nor emo. I would however liken some of their songs to alternative metal or hard rock. 144.131.33.159 (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
"Gone" edit
Hi, I'm not sure how to word this on the page, so I will leave it to the professionals, but the video clip for the track "Gone" from Imago has recently appeared (31/08) on the Playstation Store downloadable via Playstation 3, and can be obtained in either 1080p, 720p or standard definition variations. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.36.157.8 (talk) 23:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Sources for future edit
- http://musicfeeds.com.au/news/the-butterfly-effect-singer-quits-the-band/ Sergecross73 msg me 20:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
gone and done? edit
I recently stumbled above that band. Anyway, searching for their website to buy an album I just found the linked one - and this seems to be something completely different now. Could s.o. please remove the link? (I'm not familiar with the removal procedures here…). Greetings from the German WP --Espersoph (de.wikipedia.org). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.17.28.88 (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Butterfly Effect (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025053455/http://www.bluntmag.com.au/blunt-bands-butterfly-effect.html to http://www.bluntmag.com.au/blunt-bands-butterfly-effect.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.spaceshipnews.com.au/interview-butterfly-effect-wheels-heartbeat-tour/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)