A fact from Szymon Konarski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Szymon Konarski was a 19th-century Polish radical politician who believed in a revolution of all peoples of the Russian Empire that was to bring freedom and democracy to all?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The guy seems to be a typical romantic hero of the epoch - a freedom-fighter, a Russophobe, and a "revolutionary". Encyclopedia needs a more cautionary approach to such half-legendary figures who owe their importance to nationalist mythology only. Unbridled enthusiasm, in which the article is steeped, is unencyclopedic. --Ghirla | talk 17:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
You again, huh? Apparently you had not noticed that the guy spent most of his life collaborating with Russians and most of his ideas were simply those of the (Russian) Decembrists. If that is also Russophobia then please be so kind as to tell me if there were any non-russophobes in the history of mankind... Also, could you be a tad more specific? What's exactly wrong with this article? Halibutt 21:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
He's a rebel, an international terrorist and the enemy of the legitimate authorities. Ought to mention it in the article, but it has only Soviet (liberal) interpretation of his activities against the legal order of States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.147.153.51 (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
