Talk:Supermolecule

Latest comment: 16 years ago by JWSchmidt in topic References

Note edit

Please do not merge this page into supramolecular assembly or to any other page; this term is a stand-alone topic and very important in the history of the molecule, as the case with molecule, biomolecule, and macromolecule. Thanks: --Sadi Carnot 16:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Revised defintion edit

I think recent definition of supermolecule is vague. For instance a supermolecule “is any very large complex molecule” and that it “is generally considered to be bigger in size and structure than that of a macromolecule.” However a macromolecule is defined as “The literal definition of the term macromolecule implies any large molecule.” The definition of a macromolecule would therefore seem to include that of a supramolecule. I have revised definition to clarify ambiguities of what “is” and “is not” a supermolecule. M stone 22:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, well let's try to find some better sources for the intro definition. It seems you simply used my two sources, but modified the words to your views. --Sadi Carnot 16:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • I agree that the current references are inadequate. They don't really address the term supermolecule but are instead more general references to the entire area of supramolecular chemistry. I was unable to find any good reviews on the term. I look forward to seeing what you are able to dig up though! M stone 22:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Propose condensed definition edit

I have looked more into the definition of supramolecule. It seems that that the term is important because it predates the field of "supramolecular chemistry." I suggest dumping most of the more speculative intro paragraph that compares the term to supramolecular assembly and emphasizing the historical significance. I think that it would be better to state that the term is not well defined but is often used in a similar manner to supramolecular assembly. M stone 20:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


References edit

Could someone familiar with the chemical/biochemical literature check the references...particularly cited articles that have no title. --JWSchmidt 14:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply