Talk:Suave (song)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articleSuave (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 10, 2023Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suave (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will review this per your request, Erick! --K. Peake 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Shouldn't Larrabee be written as Larrabee Sound in the infobox?
  • "The song was met with positive reactions" → "The song received positive reactions"
  • Move the award-winning sentence to being the one after the above, also place the music video one after the commercial sentence
  • "by Kiko Guerrero, filmed in" → "by Kiko Guerrero and filmed in" since the last and is the only one to not use "was"
  • "Commercially, the track reached" → "Commercially, the song reached"
  • "Rivera's cover was nominated in" → "The cover was nominated in"

Background and composition edit

  • "A 27-second sample of Miguel's "Suave"," → "A 27-second sample of "Suave"," on the audio sample text, also change the title to "Suave"
  • First para looks good!
  • Wikilink as cover versions instead
  • Shouldn't you identify the album by name in the second para?
  • The dance genre is not sourced
  • "and its lyrics narrates about a" → "and its lyrics narrate about a"

Promotion and reception edit

  • Wouldn't it be more suitable to write that the live version was featured on Miguel's live albums then write the titles?
  • "listed as the best three songs" → "listed it as the best three songs"
  • Wikilink VH1
  • Why is the Notitas Musicales position not mentioned here?
  • Remove pipe on covered

Track listing edit

  • Good

Personnel edit

Weekly charts edit

  • Retitle to Charts

Jerry Rivera version edit

  • Infobox looks good!
  • The 1995 recording year is not sourced
  • Wikilink funk
  • "became his first number one song" → "became Rivera's first number one song"

Charts edit

  • Good

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

  • Copyvio score looks respectable at 33.3%!!
  • Wikilink AllMusic on ref 2 instead of ref 3, also remove Rovi Corporation
  • Cite GQ as work/website instead on ref 13 with the wikilink
  • Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 18
  • Wikilink Milenio on ref 22
  • Pipe Sony Music España to Sony Music on ref 24
  • Luis Miguel should be author linked on ref 25 instead of ref 26 and format his name in the same way for both to be consistent
  • WP:OVERLINK of AllMusic on ref 28

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed; here is your true New Year's gift! --K. Peake 09:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you for the review! @Franlm14:, can you handle it for me? My only days off work are Sunday and Mondays. Erick (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake Alright, I think I got all of them. As usual, let me know if I missed any of them. The only one that confused me was ""by Kiko Guerrero, filmed in" → "by Kiko Guerrero and filmed in" since the last and is the only one to not use "was"". Erick (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Magiciandude This point meant that it is the last part of the sentence and does not use was, also you missed changing the audio sample text. --K. Peake 21:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Magiciandude  Pass now, I had to re-edit the music video sentence since I meant the part after the comma could be changed because it did not use was. --K. Peake 09:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply