Talk:Structure from motion
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anna.bergstrom, Mackjohnson77, Jvsaghi, Kwright1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation needs to be added
editthere is a new disambiguation page: Structure from motion (disambiguation). Thus this article should be renamed, for instance, "Structure from motion (computer vision)". I was unable to do it, please help. Also the disambiguation page should be edited to reflect the new name.
Autodesk 123D Catch
editAutodesk 123D catch is a free hobby App to capture Struction from motion images, its a cloud app for iPhone 4 and newer and for the new iPads, can i ad that to the applications list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.195.234.67 (talk) 03:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
SfM vs. phtogrammetry
editFor me it is completely unclear where the difference between these two methods are. Or if they have something in common. Well, in other words, I see many people saying they are doing SfM but what I see is photogrammetry. Also in the photogrammetry article i see references of SfM as if it is just another designation for it. I'm jsut confused --Patribus (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
editing SfM for the geosciences
editI think the section on SfM for the geosciences could be edited. Particularly, there can be a citation added to the comparison of the data quality between SfM and lidar. This paper tests both methods: ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications [1] Anna.bergstrom (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021