Talk:Stephanie Cutter/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
Ms. Cutter told ABC News on 22 November 2008 that she was distraught that she was overlooked for the job of White House Communications Director. Ms. Cutter said she believed she was "snubbed" because of her controversial and generally derided handling of the Al Gore election and recount in 2000. (source: ABC This Week website) 220.244.55.175 (talk) 22:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Reminder on NPOV
Language should be neutral and respectful of all living politically active figures. I agree, there should be a better photo. Anybody got one, or can anybody get one? KSRolph (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Bias in Obama 2012 election campaign section
The section on Obama's 2012 campaign strays in bias, initially to the left then to the right. I don't see how an entire section is needed on this election, and the entire section should be rewritten more neutrally and placed as a paragraph in the Biography section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.224.111 (talk) 09:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Bias in editing
The user RedPenofDoom is inappropriately and selectively editing out properly sourced content. Have fwd'd this issue for resolution. Atxav8r (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Watch out for the boomerang. Meters (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- " I have a source" is not a valid excuse for cherry-picking content from the source and presenting it in an POV manner. for one thing the NYT piece is not an "expose" it is a standard NYT profile piece, and trying to mischaracterize it the article is inappropriate. but even if it were an "expose" that would essentially discredit its use in a BLP context. The piece itself covers a lot of ground about the subject, but Atxav8r you have been determined to ONLY select the "worst" aspects and non-encyclopedic parts and then present them in worst possible light. completely inappropriate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Where has the issue been forwarded to? I have not been able to find it on any notice board. Meters (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- " I have a source" is not a valid excuse for cherry-picking content from the source and presenting it in an POV manner. for one thing the NYT piece is not an "expose" it is a standard NYT profile piece, and trying to mischaracterize it the article is inappropriate. but even if it were an "expose" that would essentially discredit its use in a BLP context. The piece itself covers a lot of ground about the subject, but Atxav8r you have been determined to ONLY select the "worst" aspects and non-encyclopedic parts and then present them in worst possible light. completely inappropriate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Precision Strategies
as a founder of Precision and their work for the Clinton Campaign, should that be mentioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.236.225 (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stephanie Cutter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.politicshome.com/usa/Landing.aspx?Blog=4332&perma=link#4332 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616100625/http://www.gq.com:80/news-politics/politics/200911/50-most-powerful-in-dc-49 to http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/200911/50-most-powerful-in-dc-49
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Picture
Can anyone put a more flattering picture of her? She is an attractive lady --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- What exactly is unflattering about it? 71.146.146.193 (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm just curious as to the reason why she was in the Situation Room. I thought that room was generally for national security and defense matters. While Ms. Cutter is obviously an intelligent and shrewd woman, I don't think she has extensive foreign policy and/or national security experience. 74.69.121.132 (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Agree with your request, however I have a conflict to edit myself. So, I'd like to submit an edit request to update the photo with this one, which was provided by the photographer. PB Precision (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Photo
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I would like to propose an edit to replace the main photo with this one, which was provided by the photographer. PB Precision (talk) 20:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Career update
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi editors, my name is Christian and I work for Precision Strategies. I was hoping to make some updates to the article that I think will improve the sourcing and the article's accuracy. I wanted to start in the career section as I think I can help clarify the timeline of Stephanie's early career. I think something like the following helps clarify how these roles fit together and uses reliable sourcing.
References
- ^ Ball, Molly (May 30, 2012). "The Resurrection of Stephanie Cutter". The Atlantic. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Zeleny, Jeff (November 21, 2008). "The New Team: Stephanie Cutter". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Romano, Lois (July 8, 2012). "The 1-woman rapid response team". Politico. Archived from the original on April 13, 2019. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Chozick, Amy (October 12, 2012). "A Messenger Who Does the Shooting". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
Please let me know what you think! I won't make any changes myself due to conflict of interest. Thanks in advance for your help! PrecisionChristian (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done and to @PrecisionChristian: thank you for avoiding editing the article via the COI policy. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 19:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Fakescientist8000:, thank you so much for the help! I really appreciate it! I will always try to follow the COI rules closely. PrecisionChristian (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Career subsection headers
The user below has a request that an edit be made to Stephanie Cutter/Archive 1. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is low. There are currently 60 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi editors, Christian here again. I was thinking the career section could benefit from some subheadings to help separate the career progression. Something like Early career which encompasses Cutter's work through her time with Ted Kennedy, Obama campaigns and administration for 2008-2012 working on the Obama campaigns and in the White House, and Media and consulting for 2013 onward for her work in various media outlets and with Precision Strategies. I have some additional content I'd like to suggest for those subsections as well and I think it will make it easier to talk about where the changes I hope to make are. Please let me know what you think! @Fakescientist8000:, would you have any interest in reviewing this request as well? I'd really appreciate it! I won't make any edits due to my conflict of interest. Thanks in advance for the help! PrecisionChristian (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'd say that regarding subheadings (which seem to be minor edits that don't affect the article's neutrality) could be an exception to the COI policies, so if you'd like to add those in, you may. Otherwise, message me on my talk for what you want added to the article. @PrecisionChristian Cheers! Fakescientist8000 16:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Fakescientist8000:, just to be extra sensitive to the COI process, I prefer not to make any edits directly to the article. And for the sake of transparency, I'll keep posting requests on the article Talk page, but I have no problem going to your user Talk page too when I post a new request. I really appreciate your willingness to review these requests. PrecisionChristian (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Consulting work update
The user below has a request that an edit be made to Stephanie Cutter/Archive 1. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is low. There are currently 60 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi editors, I had another request. I was hoping to add some content to what I would propose to be the Consulting and media subsection. This content adds additional details about Cutter's consulting work while maintaining a neutral tone. I think something like the following would be a good addition about her work with Precision Strategies:
References
- ^ Delacourt, Susan (November 7, 2020). "Canada-U.S. relations changed over four years with Donald Trump — Justin Trudeau and Joe Biden will find some useful lessons". Toronto Star. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
- ^ Criss, Doug (May 10, 2019). "A young girl teaches active-shooter training to grownups". CNN. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
- ^ Meyer, Theodoric; Thompson, Alex (July 2, 2021). "One of the most Biden-connected firms in D.C. is exploring a sale". Politico. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
- ^ Smeyne, Rebecca; Barrayn, Laylah Amatullah; Lee, Christopher; Gilbertson, Ashley (August 23, 2020). "Opinion: What the First Virtual Convention Looked Like Across America". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
- ^ Rampton, Roberta (December 15, 2020). "Inauguration Day, From Home: Biden Team Plans Celebration Amid COVID-19". NPR. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Judkis, Maura (January 22, 2021). "Still dazzled by the inauguration show? Here's how it came together, and why Tom Hanks looked so cold". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
- ^ Freiman, Jordan (September 20, 2021). "2021 Emmy Awards: Complete list of winners and nominees". CBS News. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
- ^ "Outstanding Music Direction Nominees / Winners 2021". Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2022.
I did my best to use only top-tier reliable secondary sources, though I did add one primary source, the Emmy nominee list, just for some additional context.
I think this content is a neutral expansion of content that is partially already in the article. It also adds some new material that helps give a fuller picture of Cutter's work with Precision. Please let me know what you think! I am open to suggestions and changes on this. As always, I won't make any changes myself due to my COI. PrecisionChristian (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Fakescientist8000: thanks for the quick turnaround! That was great! I was wondering, could you also remove the following sentences? They've been made redundant by that addition:
- Besides her role at CNN Cutter founded Precision Strategies, where she is a partner. Precision Strategies is a strategic consulting firm based in Washington, D.C. and New York City. Cutter started the firm with three veterans that worked for the Obama 2012 campaign team.
- Cutter served as the Program Executive for the 2020 Democratic National Convention.
- Thanks so much for your help! PrecisionChristian (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Tomcat4680:, I saw you added the archive, did you have any interest in reviewing this request? Totally cool if not, just want to double check before I reach out to others. Please let me know! PrecisionChristian (talk) 17:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Obama work request
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi editors, Christian here with another request. I was hoping to replace the paragraph beginning "In June 2008 Cutter was appointed Chief of Staff" with the following:
References
- ^ Alspach, Kyle (November 8, 2008). "Raynham native named chief spokesperson for Obama transition". The Enterprise. Archived from the original on December 2, 2013. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ a b Chozick, Amy (October 12, 2012). "A Messenger Who Does the Shooting". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Zeleny, Jeff (November 21, 2008). "The New Team: Stephanie Cutter". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
- ^ Draper, Robert; Naddaf, Raha; Goldstein, Sarah; Hylton, Wil S.; Kirby, Mark; Veis, Greg; Newmyer, Tory (October 13, 2009). "The 50 Most Powerful People in D.C." GQ. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
I think this helps make the language more encyclopedic and offers some additional details about Cutter's early work with the Obama campaign (she didn't just work for Michelle Obama at first) and will set up future requests. I will have some other requests in the future to re-add Cutter's work on the Let's Move! campaign. If you'd like to see what I have in mind, I had uploaded a draft a while ago and made a diff with the current article so you can see what changes I've suggested. I'm open to any alternatives you may have for wording and as always I won't make any edits myself due to my conflict of interest. Thanks in advance for your help! PrecisionChristian (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have made the suggested edit request but don’t necessarily agree it is written in an entirely encyclopedic way. Interested editors are encouraged to review the new language and offer suggestions or additional edits to refine the language. I have closed the edit request as it has now been answered in it’s entirety. Go4thProsper (talk) 00:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)