A fact from State visits to the United States appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article says, with sources: "At state dinners in which the principal visitor is only a chief of government, the Chief of Protocol of the United States will greet the visitor instead. They will then be escorted into the Entrance Hall and presented to the president." But the embedded video shows Matteo Renzi, a head of government and not of state, being greeted at the portico by the president. What accounts for the contradiction? I would guess either the sources are outdated and that distinction was dropped at some point, with heads of government now getting equivalent treatment, or perhaps protocol here has long been more flexible or inconsistent than we currently say. Either way, the article should not make a statement flatly contradicted by the very video it uses to illustrate the point. Beorhtwulf (talk) 04:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
