Talk:Star Trek: Away Team

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Viriditas in topic Redirect from Away team

Even though the game franchise was on a deline, Away Team did do good in sales and got good reviews.

Untitled

edit

Ignoring the spelling/grammar for the moment: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/913866.asp

--86.137.130.143 13:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

"I changed the format layout of this page to match it to all the other pages on the Wikipedia. I also uploaded and added the front box picture for the game." - Lucky Foot

——

--KILNA 08:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is not a real-time strategy game, it's turn-based tactics game as described by other wikipedia articles... I've changed the categorization, etc. to match.

Relation to Fallout

edit

I've heard that the codebases for Away Team and Fallout have a substantial amount in common, and may even use the same "engine". How much truth is there to this? 216.228.20.138 07:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redirect from Away team

edit

I can not understand why, when I clicked a "away team" wikilink in Communicator (Star Trek), I've been brought here by a redirect, to an article about a not so much known video game, instead of one which deals with "away team" meaning in Star Trek series (that is: the landing party), which is by far more known (even to not-Star Trek fan) and more notable. So, I can not understand this redirect. --79.21.150.43 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. This is one of the worst redirects I've ever seen. I'm trying to rectify this problem. Viriditas (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Much better with "away team" now going to the disambig page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
As was pointed out in the earlier reversions, that is not "much better", but worse as WP:MALPLACED. The WP:RM that has finally been opened is much better, and (assuming it results in the move) then the dab can be rearranged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
You're confusing proper redirects and dabs with a now deleted deletion discussion. The video game has never been the primary topic. Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
You're confusing English words with whatever gave you that impression. I responded to "away team now going to the disambig page", a description of the WP:MALPLACED arrangement. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Nonsense! Why does "away team" still redirect here, a week after the problem was identified and a fix was attempted? You have used the bureaucracy of Wikipedia to prevent editors from fixing the problem. This is unacceptable. Is it more important to follow procedure or to fix a glaring error? The policies are clear on this. Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply