Talk:Star Trek: Away Team
 | A fact from Star Trek: Away Team appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Even though the game franchise was on a deline, Away Team did do good in sales and got good reviews.
Untitled edit
Ignoring the spelling/grammar for the moment: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/913866.asp
--86.137.130.143 13:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
"I changed the format layout of this page to match it to all the other pages on the Wikipedia. I also uploaded and added the front box picture for the game." - Lucky Foot
——
--KILNA 08:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
This is not a real-time strategy game, it's turn-based tactics game as described by other wikipedia articles... I've changed the categorization, etc. to match.
Relation to Fallout edit
I've heard that the codebases for Away Team and Fallout have a substantial amount in common, and may even use the same "engine". How much truth is there to this? 216.228.20.138 07:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I can not understand why, when I clicked a "away team" wikilink in Communicator (Star Trek), I've been brought here by a redirect, to an article about a not so much known video game, instead of one which deals with "away team" meaning in Star Trek series (that is: the landing party), which is by far more known (even to not-Star Trek fan) and more notable. So, I can not understand this redirect. --79.21.150.43 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. This is one of the worst redirects I've ever seen. I'm trying to rectify this problem. Viriditas (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Much better with "away team" now going to the disambig page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- As was pointed out in the earlier reversions, that is not "much better", but worse as WP:MALPLACED. The WP:RM that has finally been opened is much better, and (assuming it results in the move) then the dab can be rearranged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- You're confusing proper redirects and dabs with a now deleted deletion discussion. The video game has never been the primary topic. Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- You're confusing English words with whatever gave you that impression. I responded to "away team now going to the disambig page", a description of the WP:MALPLACED arrangement. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nonsense! Why does "away team" still redirect here, a week after the problem was identified and a fix was attempted? You have used the bureaucracy of Wikipedia to prevent editors from fixing the problem. This is unacceptable. Is it more important to follow procedure or to fix a glaring error? The policies are clear on this. Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- You're confusing English words with whatever gave you that impression. I responded to "away team now going to the disambig page", a description of the WP:MALPLACED arrangement. -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- You're confusing proper redirects and dabs with a now deleted deletion discussion. The video game has never been the primary topic. Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- As was pointed out in the earlier reversions, that is not "much better", but worse as WP:MALPLACED. The WP:RM that has finally been opened is much better, and (assuming it results in the move) then the dab can be rearranged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Much better with "away team" now going to the disambig page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)