Talk:Soviet submarine S-99

Soviet submarine S-99 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 11, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet submarine S-99/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 03:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Initial review

I plan to review this article for GA class. Overall, it looks good. Djmaschek (talk) 03:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

B class review

This article meets all the criteria for B class. Djmaschek (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Review 1

@Sturmvogel 66: Referring to the following issues, please fix or argue your case for not fixing. Djmaschek (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well-written, verifiable, broad coverage, neutral, stable, illustrated. Done
Introduction: "Soviet Union" and "submarine" are each linked twice within the introduction paragraph.
Narrative-infobox contradiction: Submerged displacement is different (1,500 t vs. 1,215 t).
Description, paragraph 1: "Draft (ship)" is in the narrative. Omit the "(ship)" part.
Infobox, Complement & Surface speed: I cannot find the crew size (51) or surface speed (11 knots) in the narrative.
Construction and career, sentence 2: "Platonov says" (Source is Pavlov, not Platonov.)
- Too many Soviet destroyer articles for which Platonov is a key reference!
  - All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    - @Sturmvogel 66: GA class. Please have a look at 1500 tonnes = 1500 long tons submerged displacement in infobox and narrative. Surface displacement (950 t = 930 LT) shows the units are different, so readers may be confused. I recommend adding round=5 parameter to convert function to make it 1500 t = 1475 LT, but you may wish to use a different rounding value. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
      - Good catch, done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic