Talk:Sochi agreement

split article

Currently the article mentions at least four different Sochi agreements, not even all related to each other. I think that the aricle should either be split, or be styled more like a disambiguation page to reflect that Sochi agreement really is ambiguous.sephia karta 12:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Dagomys accords?

Is this the same agreement as the Dagomys Accords of 1992? [1] Offliner (talk) 00:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sochi agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061019100107/http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2368481 to http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2368481

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sochi agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061019093151/http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2368350 to http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2368350

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Article isn't from a neutral point of view

This article has several issues and a real lack of neutral POV. 1) This article is confusing and doesn't situate the conflict and Sochi agreement/ceasefires in the larger context of Georgian-Russian relations. 2) It's shows a bias by restating a larger Russian claim - "claim that the stated American justification for the BMD deployments—that the systems are needed to defend the United States and European countries against an emerging Iranian missile threat—lacked credibility. Instead, they insisted the true objective of such moves along Russia's periphery was to weaken Russia's nuclear deterrent." without any context. 3) The article doesn't make an attempt to describe what the CIS is, what/why joining or leaving it matters to Russia, but does bring it up as a reason for the status of the Agreements to change. Confusing! 4) Can we get a timeline?

I suggest either deleting or slimming the article way down - why does this article really exist? - Or adding in NPOV context as to why all these Sochi agreements are happening. SubcomandanteOvashinsky (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

I think that the "Other Sochi Summits" section should be removed from the article and merged into the Russo-Georgian relations and Russo-American relations. Alaexis_¿question? 18:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)