Talk:Skyfox (1984 video game)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ammarpad in topic Requested move 15 March 2018
 | A fact from Skyfox (1984 video game) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Image edit
Gosh, the image we have for Skyfox is so small that it look horrid when it's blown up. Can't we get a better image from somewhere? — Frecklefoot | Talk 19:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
Requested move 15 March 2018 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved There's consensus for move. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Skyfox → Skyfox (1984 video game)
- Sky Fox (arcade game) → Sky Fox (1987 video game)
- Skyfox (disambiguation) → Skyfox
– No clear primary topic here. This should become a disambiguation which is also pointed to by Sky Fox. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support As per nom. See also pageviews for further support. Shadow007 (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose the move of Sky Fox (arcade game), as there is no other page at that name to disambiguate from that necessitates the proposed change.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- See WP:NCVGDAB. "Video game" is preferred to "arcade game" as a disambiguator. Shadow007 (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support all the gap between sky and fox is not consistently observed in sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, Shadow007 and In ictu oculi. No evidence that the 1984 video game is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 03:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. But I am a little worried that because these were released in such a narrow time frame that the year disambig could still be confusing. I don't think though that we'd easily be able to use platform in place of year, so I'd strongly recommend a hatnote on both pages pointing to each other. -- Netoholic @ 05:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.