Talk:Sir Bevil Grenville's Monument

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review
Good articleSir Bevil Grenville's Monument has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSir Bevil Grenville's Monument is part of the English Heritage properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2015Good article nomineeListed
July 9, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

What else is needed before a GA nomination? edit

What else do people think needs to be done to this article to ensure it meets the Good article criteria before a nomination?— Rod talk 08:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sir Bevil Grenville's Monument/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


  • Grabbing this one for a review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, review time.

  • Lead: Swap around cites 3 and 2 so that they're in the correct numerical order.
  • History: As with the other article, move citations to after the following punctuation mark for cleanliness.
  • As before done where a cite only covers one fact in the sentence but moved now
  • Typo in the last sentence of the section: "rapairs" - "repairs"
  • "funded by Granvilles descendants" = "funded by Granville's descendants"?
  • Thanks - I'm always being criticised for apostrophe abuse.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • "Battle of Lansdowne(1643)" - needs a space between Lansdowne and (1643)
  • Background - I'd move this section up above History, as it'll be the first thing to occur in the timeline.

Once you've dealt with those, I'll take another look. Miyagawa (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Great, happy to promote this one too. Miyagawa (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply