Talk:Sherlock Holmes: The Mystery of the Mummy

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Geoff B in topic Wait!

Wait! edit

Before deleting the article, give me some time to bring it up to code. I didn't start it but I get 63,000 Google hits when I verified it. Ifnord 23:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It needs spelling fixes, and a clarifiction if it's a board game or PC game or both. And obviously more content. --Brat32 23:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Is there not also a Nintendo DS game of the same name? Or at least, it's something similar... I haven't found any mention of the DS game on wikipedia yet, but then again, I'm not done looking =] --81.159.206.130 (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
One of the Sherlock Holmes games was ported to the DS. Think it was this one. Geoff B (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Mummy box.jpg edit

 

Image:Mummy box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source edit