Talk:Severe thunderstorm warning

Difference between Watch and Warning

• • The third to last line stated that "In the United States, the National Weather Service issues warnings for tornadoes and severe thunderstorms in the shapes of parallelograms, with yellow meaning severe thunderstorm and red signaling tornado." This is not true. Watches are issued in this shape, but warnings are issued by county/parish. --...::: DietCoke119 :::... 18:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree on the watches - but if you look at the recent NWS radars, you will find that warnings are also shaped - and not by county. The county is given as a reference, but usually the warnings are along the forecasted path of the storm and do not cover the entire county (depending on its size) When the NWS main page maps show warnings they show the entire county only because of their limited ability to show the exact locations. master son^{T - C} 23:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

This issue was caused by a vandalizing editor named SFK2 who was vandalizing severe thunderstorm warning and will be blocked from editing for 5 years-May 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1006:B120:4D26:BFB0:1B2D:AF0B:4A2F (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Actually, the above info is old information. The NWS has been issuing warnings using boxes for quite a while now. They did it to try & improve upon the False Alarm Rate they experienced using the old, county-based system of issuing warnings. Many people in the USA unfortunately still get county-based warnings because the downstream automated systems (like sirens, etc.) that process those warnings can't necessarily provide the needed detail to the public. Guy1890 (talk) 20:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Severe thunderstorm warning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/dvn/downloads/spring2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Severe thunderstorm warning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/dvn/downloads/spring2009.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060703204148/http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/cd/brochures/warning_e.cfm to http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/cd/brochures/warning_e.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Severe thunderstorm warning

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Severe thunderstorm warning's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Dissemination":

• From Tornado warning: "NWS Dissemination Services". NWS Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. Retrieved January 10, 2010.
• From First Warning: NWS Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. "NWS Dissemination Services". Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. Retrieved January 10, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• From National Weather Service: "NWS Dissemination Services". NWS Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on December 12, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Wording confusion

In the article there's a spot where it says, "no hail size will be indicated in the “Hazard” row nor will a description of damage risk will be included in the “Impact” section". Is it supposed to say "no hail size will not be indicated.." or is the wording just a bit weird? Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)