Talk:Scarra

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Delta fiver in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (There’re sufficient amount of references and notability of this person.) --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The language used in the article, clearly does not conform to standards required here on the Wikipedia. Aside from that, the links in the article are poor and don't convey notability. Links like, www.esportsearnings.com and TopTwitchStreamers, are secondary sources that can't be used to provide direct notability as they aren't notable articles written by news agencies as supported for BLPs. Aside from that YouTube links are used in most cases to help with context and dispute solving rather than generating notability, team websites as used here don't generate notability by themselves rather they help with improving notability. The subject of the article isn't notable on his own either, there are many other former pro players, turned streamers who started their own thing, but there's nothing special to prove they require their own standalone articles. The article was severely rushed and uploaded without an adequate AFC review which would have identified these issues, deletion for now is required until a draft is improved. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 13:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've added additional information and references to back up this article. --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 13:57, 15 November 2020

The Eranbot has detected potential copyright violations with the edits you have made. It's best that the information added in is removed, as it encourages the page to get deleted faster because they are issues with copyright material. It's best you remove the information added in good faith as nearly everything is completely plagiarized from here [1] A copyvios test has suspected violation, see here [2] Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 14:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rewritten and removed some of the copyright. --DeltaSquad833 (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2020

The copyright material still reads high on the detector. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 14:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

In that case if possible move it to draft space. DeltaSquad833 (talk) 09:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

You have made a great attempt at improving notability, but I too, think it's best to move it back to the draft space as there are still issues with notability, copyright and language. When I move it back, I want it to be submitted to the AFC when ready, please do not move it back to the article space until another reviewer like me has examined the article. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 10:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will do, thanks for the help. DeltaSquad833 (talk) 10:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

No problem, I'll help with what I can, good luck! Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 10:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply