Talk:Salamandridae

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move edit

True Salamander → Salamandridae – Not only is it improperly capitalised (since it refers to a higher taxon), but the family includes newts as well as the true salamanders (indeed, more newts than salamanders). There is no common name for this taxon, which should therefore be at the scientific name. I'm only prevented from doing it myself by the two-line edit history at Salamandridae. --Stemonitis 13:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 09:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is a horrible page edit

The entire page it taken up by a list and has almost no data at all on the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.241.144 (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Capitalization edit

I started lowercasing species names per WT:CAPS; someone asked me to put a note here that I'm doing it, so here it is. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Taxobox edit

shouldn't Caudata be the clade not the order which appears to be Urodela? Bodrugan (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Depends on the source. Amphibian Species of the World uses Caudata as the order, as do ITIS. In any case, there is currently a discussion about what source(s) we should use in this project, so any change at this level should better wait until some conclusion is reached. Micromesistius (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Bodrugan (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Molge edit

Do taxonomic articles have a standard way of addressing former genera? For example, Molge meridionalis redirects to Notophthalmus meridionalis, yet there doesn't seem to be anything else in Wikipedia mentioning the (apparently) former genus Molge, if someone tried to look that up. I'm sure there are other examples, but I happened to check Molge because of its notable appearance in a P. G. Wodehouse novel. RCTodd (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

It is possible to mention, or, better yet, discuss why one taxon was subsumed/synonymized into another taxon if we can find the appropriate source that discusses that situation. Scholar.google and books.google are two good places to start.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salamandridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply