Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 1996 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Hi Courcelles! I am going to review this article as well. I will complete a quick c/e of the article first. Feel free to revert any of the changes, as I will only make what I feel are non-controversial improvements. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyedit
Prose & MOS
Images
References
  • Are there any other references you can include? The article relies almost completely on one source (Sports Reference).
    • I've added citations to the official report, though the reality is SR is a much easier version of the same data to navigate and read. Courcelles (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • You archived all of the citations, even though all the pages are live? Is there a reason why?
    • The SR website has a giant notice on the top of it that it'll be closing "soon". Courcelles (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • All other references, formatting, and inline locations look good. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Overall
  • Overall, the article is short and concise on a fiarly limited topic. Nice work, again! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply