Talk:Rudra Mahalaya Temple/GA2

GA Reassessment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Delisted. There is no scope of getting a GA without radical additions. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The article is barely Start-class. See a list of issues. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your assessment. I don't remember that it was promoted to GA. It does not meet GA standards in my opinion. Needs a lot of work to be GA. It is start-class. - Nizil (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic