Talk:Rudra Mahalaya Temple

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TrangaBellam in topic Issues
Former good articleRudra Mahalaya Temple was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2016Good article nomineeListed
January 24, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Rudra Mahalaya Temple, Sidhpur is an ancient ruined temple complex built to lavish proportions during the 12th century by the Jayasimha Siddharaja of the Solanki dynasty?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rudra Mahalaya Temple/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

General
  • No copyvio detected
  • No dablinks detected
  • External links check out
Lead
  • Make sure the lead is just a subset of the main article. Citations are generally not kept in the lead unless you say something controversial, they go into the main article
    • Shifted along with some text
Location
  • "king Jayasimha Siddharaja" Mention his dynasty
    • Added
  • In view of a large number of ancient temples in Sidhpur it is a highly revered place' I think "it is a highly revered place" should come first
    • You are right. Done now
History
  • Chaulukyas (950-1303/04) Endash
    • I hope I have used the correct symbol
      • Um, no. I fixed it.
Architecture
  • Its overall dimension was "dimensions were"
    • Done
Images
  • Seem to be too many here, especially the one to the left.
    • Img on the left removed
  • Thanks for the review. I have addressed all issues. Pl see.Nvvchar. 03:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good job! Promoted. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 03:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Ruins of the Rudra Mala at Siddhpur, Gujarat, retouched.jpg scheduled for POTD edit

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:Ruins of the Rudra Mala at Siddhpur, Gujarat, retouched.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 8, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-02-08. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The Rudra Mahalaya Temple is an ancient temple complex at Siddhpur in the Patan district of Gujarat, India. The temple was completed in 1140 by Jayasimha Siddharaja, but in 1296, Alauddin Khalji sent an army under Ulugh Khan and Nusrat Khan, who dismantled the structure. In 1414 or 1415, the temple was further destroyed and the western part was converted into a congregational mosque by Muslim ruler Ahmad Shah I of the Muzaffarid dynasty. Apart from the mosque, the surviving fragments consist of two porches, a torana (ornamental gateway) and a few pillars.

Photograph credit: Bourne & Shepherd; retouched by Yann Forget

Recently featured:

Issues edit

  • Patel, Alka (2004). "Architectural Histories Entwined: The Rudra-Mahalaya/Congregational Mosque of Siddhpur, Gujarat". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 63 (2): 144–163. doi:10.2307/4127950. JSTOR 4127950. should have been used extensively.
  • Scholars studying the Rudra Mahalaya have been mostly intrigued by the partial destruction and reuse. The events, the motivations etc. We had nothing on that.
  • I have added a single line.
  • The dimensions and all architectural details are disputed (see Patel.)
@Hemantha: - Are you in the process of rewriting this article? Best wishes, TrangaBellam (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, I just reworded that section as it seemed to be based on low quality sources. Sorry if I stepped on any toes and for not checking the talk page. Feel free to revert. Hemantha (talk) 10:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nah - it is all good. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment edit

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Rudra Mahalaya Temple/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article is barely Start-class. See a list of issues. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • I agree with your assessment. I don't remember that it was promoted to GA. It does not meet GA standards in my opinion. Needs a lot of work to be GA. It is start-class. - Nizil (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.