This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The contents of the River Ore, Suffolk page were merged into River Alde. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (14 October 2015)
Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
It's been proposed, after a bit of discussion on Cmglee's talk page, that the River Ore article be merged with River Alde. Essentially it seems like the two rivers are one and the same and it would allow some rationalisation of pages around the river and it's estuary - there's an SSSI page and at least one nature reserve page involved as well as the Ness. Thoughts? Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Agree Support for Blue Square Thing's reasons above. I'd also suggest having a map showing the range of the 2 rivers. cmɢʟee୯ ͡° ̮د ͡° ੭ 22:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
@Cmglee: uh, not quite... you didn't place the redirect on the River Ore article that would redirect people to this article instead. I've done it for you now. ;-) Richard3120 (talk) 23:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I suppose that in the box the 'tributary river Ore' is a misprint of 'tributary river Butley' pietro151.29.189.70 (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply