Talk:Riedel (glass manufacturer)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Shameless ... edit
... advertising. Maikel (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- I cleaned up a bit, but there's still no documentation and nothing on modern history. The layout sucks too. Bellagio99 (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, horrible. No references, boring, not at all wiki quality. Please, someone, do something about this! Anuraagt (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Vivant edit
Propose saying the vivant series is less expensive, rather than "cheaper" unless sources are cited indicating that the vivant series is somehow 'cheaper' than, say the vinum - unless the implied lack of lead someone reduces the value/effect of the wine glass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.128.166.74 (talk) 01:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation? edit
Perhaps this article needs a disambiguation note. Riedel is also a surname. Richard David Ramsey 15:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sure thing. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Wiki editors - please help! edit
Wiki editors, this article is really terribly written - few or no citations, very dull, strangely limited in its overview. Can someone please help with this? The article needs a great deal of trimming, and also to be brought up to date. It's not even remotely Wikipedia quality. Anuraagt (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)