Talk:Richard Williams (RAAF officer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleRichard Williams (RAAF officer) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 31, 2011.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 24, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
November 29, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 25, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Air Marshal Sir Richard Williams (pictured) is known as the "father" of the Royal Australian Air Force?
Current status: Featured article

RAAF personnel in Europe in Australian units edit

Nice expansion, Ian. I'm not sure if it was you who added: "Williams maintained that RAAF personnel in Europe should serve in Australian units to preserve their national identity, rather than be integrated into RAF squadrons, but he was overruled"(?) I'm just curious -- separate squadrons were a key aspect of Article XV and I was under the impression that the RAAF were quite keen on it, but they just didn't jump up and own about it. Or was Williams proposing that they should jump up and down about it? Cheers, Grant | Talk 04:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks mate. Yes I added that, this is pretty much a complete rewrite of everything that was there before as well as expansion since the previous version was largely a straight copy of RW's AWM bio. Thanks for picking up on this - it shows the value of peer reviews as my wording was a bit lazy. As the EATS article states, "Under Article XV of the training plan, graduates were supposed to be assigned to squadrons from their own air forces or with a specific national designation, which were under the operational control of the Royal Air Force (RAF). [...] However, in practice — and technically in contravention of Article XV — most personnel from other air forces, while they were under RAF operational control, were assigned to British units." What I was implying in the Williams article is that he was unhappy that the Article XV provisions were not often followed in practice - the "overruled" part is an oversimplification. Suppose I reword the RW article to something like: "Williams maintained that RAAF personnel in Europe should serve in Australian units to preserve their national identity, as per Article XV of the Empire Air Training Scheme, rather than be integrated into RAF squadrons, but in practice most served in British units." Cheers, Ian Rose 08:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Director General of Civil Aviation edit

1946 to 1955 is about nine years, not 20 as stated.Grahamec 02:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Appears to have been best part of 10 years but, in any case, mea culpa and thanks for spotting it. Cheers, Ian Rose 03:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

RAF edit

He appears to have briefly held an RAF commission per "No. 32078". The London Gazette. 8 October 1920. {{cite magazine}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) - worth mentioning? (he also listed under the RAF for his OBE, albeit with (AusFC) after his name) David Underdown (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Now also found the original notice of the RAF commission "a temp, supplemental commn. as Lt.-Col. (A.). 28th June 1918.", "No. 31380". The London Gazette. 3 June 1919. {{cite magazine}}: Check date values in: |date= (help). Presuambly the end of his RAF commission coincides with his return to Australia. David Underdown (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Heh, I've just found out why he had this additional commission - so that as an Australian he could exercise discipline over the British units under his command while OC of No. 40 Wing RAF! In itself, I thought mentioning the RAF commission would be a bit confusing - now that we know the reason for it, it's definitely going in... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Richard Williams and the Palestine Brigade edit

The following comments have been copied from my talk page and are listed here for continuity's sake:

Hi mate, I'm dubious about the Palestine Brigade appointment if RAF Web is the only reference - I've used that site often in B/GA-class articles but to be honest I doubt it cuts the mustard as a reliable source at FA level. None of my other refs mention Williams as anything higher than 40th Wing commander so unless there's further authoritative citations somewhere I think we should delete it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Confirmation of Williams appointment is on the Australian Dictionary of Biography (http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/A120566b.htm) which states that "After a brief period as temporary brigade commander, Williams was appointed O.B.E. in January 1919." The rafweb reference and this one are good enough for me. What do you think? Greenshed (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Heh, fair enough! I even used the ADB when writing the article yonks ago but obviously didn't immediately associate 'temporary brigade commander' with the Palestine Brigade mentioned earlier 'cos it wasn't spelt out. I still think RAF Web could be challenged as a reliable source at this level, as I'd equate it with The Aerodrome, which has been challenged at A-Class. For that reason I'm happy to leave this now but will add ADB as another citation; reckon we should also spell out 'temporary' commander. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
BTW, you planning to make good on those red links soon? Do you want to do one and me the other - I agree they should have articles, I just like to get rid of red links as soon as possible...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Rafweb is almost always reliable although I have seen a couple of errors there (even published paper sources are subject to this sort of low frequency error rate). The author, Malcolm Barrass, has used the London Gazette along with a wide range of other sources but we don't know exactly where each snippet of information comes from. As regards red links, I agree and I am working on RAF Palestine Brigade at the moment. Any assistance would be gratefully recieved. I will try and help if you set to work on No. 40 Wing RAF but I will be away from WP for much of this weekend though. Greenshed (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yep, don't get me wrong, I think RAF Web is great, sober and unsensational, a real labour of love that I've used many times. It's just that being private and not employing citations clouds its benefits a bit as far as A/FA-level articles go, similar to The Aerodrome (though every now and then that one does cite its sources). Anyway, good talking, I'm taking a bit of break as well after a solid month in Feb... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Richard Williams (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Richard Williams (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Williams (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Richard Williams (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply