Talk:Radeon R400 series

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
  • Why I removed the 'Features' section: Nearly all of it can be found verbatim on several sites on google, thus its not original. Even more than that though, it feels too much like whoever wrote it is trying to advertise the Radeon. The rest indeed seems encyclopedic, but as it was the 'Features' were not. Chaz 02:56, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

Firefox: I was not trying to 'advertise' it in any way, I was just stating the features and technology it has.

  • Are these specs correct? Radeon X1300 Pixel pipelines: 4 Vertex Processors: 2. That means it has as many pipelines as a Radeon X600! I wonder what the performance is?

Uhh, Psxer, why'd you change all references of Megabyte to Mebibyte?

ATi vs ATI

edit

I changed all the instances of ATi to ATI. I'm a big fan of ATI cards, don't get me wrong, but in print ATI is a lot more readable and typable than ATi. --Alexwcovington (talk) 02:49, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

potential vandalism

edit

an editor may want to check the validity of the information added in this diff, as the author has a record of vandalizing articles. –MT 08:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Radeon x800

edit

I made this the Radeon x300-x800 page. The NVIDIA pages are split into core revisions, so I see no reason why ATI should not be styled in the came fashion. Seems reasonably well accepted as a categorisation methodology.

power consumption

edit

i wonder if anyone could add stats on power consumption for each series? that would be interesting:)

Keep in mind...

edit

Most of these cards are available in 128/256/512mb flavors, maybe we need to put a disclaimer saying that. I went ahead and changed the X800GTO, cause I personally have a 128mb version of x800gto


Reads a bit like an ATI Advert in places

edit

using phrases like "ATI's excellent blah blah" isn't in line with wiki's guidelines. this article needs serious work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.140.17 (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ATi Radeon R400 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ATi Radeon R400 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply