![]() | Quintonil is currently an Agriculture, food and drink good article nominee. Nominated by (CC) Tbhotch™ at 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Mexican restaurant in Mexico City |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
![]() | A fact from Quintonil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 04:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants tied with two Michelin stars, the highest ratings in Mexico's first guide?
- Source: [1] On Tuesday, the Michelin Guide announced its first-ever rankings for the country, with two two-star restaurants and 16 one-star spots.
- ALT1: ... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants were awarded two Michelin stars in Mexico's first guide? Source: [2] On Tuesday, the Michelin Guide announced its first-ever rankings for the country, with two two-star restaurants and 16 one-star spots.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Girl Friday (TV programme)
- Comment: 5x expanded / created. It says 1 QPQ is required, but this is a multi-nomination: Template:Did you know nominations/Mrs. Brisby
(CC) Tbhotch™ 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work. This looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Hi! Thanks for reviewing it. I noticed that I could also expand List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico. Can I add it to this nomination as follows?
- ALT2: ... that Pujol and Quintonil restaurants tied with two Michelin stars, the highest ratings in Mexico's first guide?
Here is the QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Taste of Summer. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: Sure. My review is as follows. Epicgenius (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Michelin starred restaurants in Mexico:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Quintonil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Snatch! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Reference section is available. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
Quickfail?
edit- Article is stable.
- Earwig top result: 24.8%. No severe copyright violations.
- No mistakes in previous GA reviews to note.
- No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
- No glaring errors.